In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with a Multi-Directional Expandable Device

    Final Number:
    1214

    Authors:
    Hani Malone MD; Josha Woodward BS; Richard G. Fessler MD PhD

    Study Design:
    Clinical Trial

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2018 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Anterior and lateral approaches to the lumbar disc-space facilitate the placement of large interbody grafts, but have the potential for approach-related complications. Posterior approaches (PLIF/TLIF) have relatively little approach-related morbidity, but disc-space access and interbody device size is limited. This limitation has led to the development of many vertically-expandable interbody devices. In this study, we evaluate the safety and efficacy of implanting a lumbar interbody device that expands in both the axial and sagittal planes, thus enlarging the axial footprint achievable from a traditional posterior approach.

    Methods: A retrospective review was completed evaluating MIS-TLIFs performed by the senior author (RF) using a multi-directional expandable interbody device (Luna 3D Interbody, Benvenue Medical). Radiographic measurements were based on pre-/post- operative upright X-rays with flexion/extension views. Patient reported outcome measures were also collected.

    Results: Forty-five consecutive patients were treated over 16 months. Analysis was limited to patients (n=31) with at least 6 month post-operative follow up (mean follow up 309 days, 52% women, mean age 61). All but one patient experienced improvement in pain scores (VAS pre-op mean 7.0, post-op mean 2.8, p<0.001). Disability scores improved for all patients (ODI pre-op mean 40, post-op mean 17, p<0.001). All patients with follow up >12 months (n=25) had evidence of successful arthrodesis on dynamic flexion-extension radiographs. When present, spondylolisthesis was reduced by a mean 69.5% (4 mm). On average, disc height increased by 4.5mm and lordosis at the operative level increased by 3°. No instances of graft subsidence or hardware failure occurred. Complications associated with placement occurred in two separate instances (1 durotomy, 1 graft migration).

    Conclusions: In this case series, placement of a multi-expandable interbody cage via a MIS TLIF was safe and effective. This study is ongoing with the intent of better understanding the clinical and radiographic outcomes that can be reliably achieved.

    Patient Care: If safe and effective, the placement of larger interbody grafts may mitigate the risk of pseudoarthrosis following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

    Learning Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of implanting a lumbar interbody device with a large circular footprint through a narrow posterior surgical corridor using novel multi-directional expanding interbody technology.

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy