In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Novel Surgical Treatment Strategies for Unstable Lumbar Osteodiscitis: A Three Patient Case Series

    Final Number:

    Authors:
    Michael Bohl MD; Randall Hlubek MD; Jay D. Turner MD, PhD; Edward Reece MD; Udaya K. Kakarla MD; Steve W. Chang MD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:
    Spine

    Meeting: Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves Spine Summit- 2017

    Introduction: Surgical treatment of lumbar osteomyelitis is indicated when medical management fails or when patients present with spinal instability or neural compromise. Achieving successful arthrodesis can be difficult in these patients, and can sometimes require alternative surgical techniques.

    Methods: This study reports on 3 novel methods for achieving successful arthrodesis in patients with lumbar osteomyelitis. In the first method, a vascularized iliac crest graft on a quadratus lumborum pedicle was utilized. In the second method, an anterior approach with debridement of the affected lumbar levels was followed by rotation of a vascularized iliac crest graft on an iliacus muscle pedicle into the anterior lumbar defect. In the third method, structural, nonvascularized iliac crest graft was harvested via a lateral approach to provide better surgical access and an autologous, tricortical bone graft which is placed in the debridement defect.

    Results: Most recent followup imaging in each case suggests successful early incorporation of the grafts into their respective fusion beds. The first patient developed pseudoarthrosis 2 levels below where the vascularized graft was used. During surgical revision, the vascularized graft was explored and found to be incorporating well into the surrounding bone with maintained vascularity. The second patient developed a postoperative infected hematoma. Given that this patient's bone graft was vascularized, we were able to treat the graft in situ with IV antibiotics.

    Conclusions: Certain patients with multiple risk factors for pseudarthrosis and recurrent infection will likely require an alternative surgical strategy for augmenting fusion. These patients are likely to benefit from vascularized or nonvascularized autografts. This study describes three novel methods for performing lumbar debridement, fixation, and fusion in the lumbar spine using vascularized or nonvascularized autograft. These methods furthermore accommodate posterior, anterior, and lateral surgical approaches. Further experience with these techniques is required to compare outcomes with traditional techniques.

    Patient Care: Lumbar osteomyelitis is an increasingly common and very difficult condition to treat as patients typically present with numerous comorbidities and exceptionally high risk for pseudoarthrosis. This study demonstrated 3 novel techniques for augmenting fusion rates in these patients with little additional morbidity. This research therefore has the potential to improve surgical outcomes for patients with lumbar osteomyelitis.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) Describe the importance of surgical techniques that augment fusion rates in patients with lumbar osteomyelitis, 2) Discuss, in small groups, the advantages and disadvantages of these surgical techniques in treating patients at high risk of pseudoarthrosis, 3) Identify effective alternative surgical strategies for augmenting fusion rates in patients with lumbar osteomyelitis.

    References: 1. Acosta FL, Jr., Chin CT, Quinones-Hinojosa A, et al.: Diagnosis and management of adult pyogenic osteomyelitis of the cervical spine. Neurosurg Focus 17:E2, 2004. 2. Chelsom J, Solberg CO: Vertebral osteomyelitis at a Norwegian university hospital 1987-97: clinical features, laboratory findings and outcome. Scand J Infect Dis 30:147-151, 1998. 3. Jensen AG, Espersen F, Skinhoj P, et al.: Increasing frequency of vertebral osteomyelitis following Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in Denmark 1980-1990. J Infect 34:113-118, 1997. 4. Schimmer RC, Jeanneret C, Nunley PD, et al.: Osteomyelitis of the cervical spine: a potentially dramatic disease. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:110-117, 2002. 5. Aliano KA, Agulnick M, Cohen B, et al.: Spinal reconstruction for osteomyelitis with free vascularized fibular grafts using intra-abdominal recipient vessels: A series of three cases. Microsurgery 33:560-566, 2013. 6. Lu DC, Wang V, Chou D: The use of allograft or autograft and expandable titanium cages for the treatment of vertebral osteomyelitis. Neurosurgery 64:122-129; discussion 129-130, 2009. 7. Fayazi AH, Ludwig SC, Dabbah M, et al.: Preliminary results of staged anterior debridement and reconstruction using titanium mesh cages in the treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral osteomyelitis. Spine J 4:388-395, 2004. 8. Hee HT, Majd ME, Holt RT, et al.: Better treatment of vertebral osteomyelitis using posterior stabilization and titanium mesh cages. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:149-156; discussion 156, 2002. 9. Lee MC, Wang MY, Fessler RG, et al.: Instrumentation in patients with spinal infection. Neurosurg Focus 17:E7, 2004. 10. Levi AD, Dickman CA, Sonntag VK: Management of postoperative infections after spinal instrumentation. J Neurosurg 86:975-980, 1997. 11. Carragee EJ, Kim D, van der Vlugt T, et al.: The clinical use of erythrocyte sedimentation rate in pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:2089-2093, 1997. 12. Dimar JR, Carreon LY, Glassman SD, et al.: Treatment of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis with anterior debridement and fusion followed by delayed posterior spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:326-332; discussion 332, 2004. 13. Erdmann D, Meade RA, Lins RE, et al.: Use of the microvascular free fibula transfer as a salvage reconstruction for failed anterior spine surgery due to chronic osteomyelitis. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:2438-2445; discussion 2446-2437, 2006. 14. de Boer HH, Wood MB, Hermans J: Reconstruction of large skeletal defects by vascularized fibula transfer. Factors that influenced the outcome of union in 62 cases. Int Orthop 14:121-128, 1990. 15. Wood MB: Free vascularized bone transfers for nonunions, segmental gaps, and following tumor resection. Orthopedics 9:810-816, 1986. 16. Hu H, Winters HA, Paul RM, et al.: Internal thoracic vessels used as pedicle graft for anastomosis with vascularized bone graft to reconstruct C7-T3 spinal defects: a new technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:601-605, 2007. 17. Taylor GI, Miller GD, Ham FJ: The free vascularized bone graft. A clinical extension of microvascular techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 55:533-544, 1975. 18. Ackerman DB, Rose PS, Moran SL, et al.: The results of vascularized-free fibular grafts in complex spinal reconstruction. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:170-176, 2011. 19. Lee MJ, Ondra SL, Mindea SA, et al.: Indications and rationale for use of vascularized fibula bone flaps in cervical spine arthrodeses. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:1-7, 2005. 20. Winters HA, van Engeland AE, Jiya TU, et al.: The use of free vascularised bone grafts in spinal reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:516-523, 2010. 21. Yelizarov VG, Minachenko VK, Gerasimov OR, et al.: Vascularized bone flaps for thoracolumbar spinal fusion. Ann Plast Surg 31:532-538, 1993.

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy