In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Long-term Efficacy of Microsurgical Clipping Versus Endovascular Coiling of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Final Number:
    528

    Authors:
    Lida Mirzaei MD; Alexander F. C. Hulsbergen BS; Arthur Van der Boog BS; Rania A Mekary PhD; Ivo S Muskens BSc; Timothy R. Smith MD PhD MPH; Marike Broekman MD, PhD, JD; Wouter A Moojen

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2018 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Since the paradigm shift in treatment preference of intracranial aneurysms towards the endovascular modality, the long-term efficacy of coiling has been a subject of debate. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate which approach offered the best long-term outcomes with respect to rates of recurrence, retreatment, and re-bleeding when comparing endovascular coiling to microsurgical clipping.

    Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines using Pubmed and Embase. Cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a surgical and an endovascular arm of at least 10 patients each and a median follow-up of at least 3 years were included. Pooled effect estimates for the reported outcomes were calculated using the fixed-effects and random-effects models for efficacy outcomes.

    Results: Out of the 4876 articles from the search strategy, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria of which three reported on RCTs. Comparing endovascular coiling to microsurgical clipping, the overall relative risk using the fixed effect model was 9.3 for recurrence (95% confidence interval (CI) = 5.7, 15.1; I2= 0%; P-heterogeneity=0.87; ;7 studies), 2.5 for rebleeding (95% CI = 1.1, 4.0; I2= 0%; P-heterogeneity=0,74; 6 studies), and 4.6 for retreatment (95% CI = 3.5, 6.1; I2=0%; P-heterogeneity= 0,94; 8 studies). In the random effects model, similar results were found for all outcomes. Metaregression on length of follow-up, patient age, mean aneurysm size, ruptured vs. unruptured aneurysms, or posterior vs. anterior location did not yield significant results (all P-interaction >= 0.05). No significant publication bias was identified for any of the outcomes.

    Conclusions: The results of this study suggested that microsurgical clipping as primary treatment of intracranial aneurysms was associated with better long-term efficacy in terms of recurrence, rebleed, and retreatment.

    Patient Care: This research sheds light on long term outcomes of patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with different techniques, and may guide clinical decision making when choosing the optimal treatment modality for these patients.

    Learning Objectives: To better understand the long term efficacy of microsurgical and endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysm

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy