In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Extra-Femoral Access (Trans-Radial or Trans-Cervical Carotid) for Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Final Number:
    1247

    Authors:
    Aleka N Scoco MD; Murray Echt MD; Hoang Tang; Aravind Addepalli; Shaoyu Zhu; Joshua Benton BA; Jonathan P Nakhla MD; Neil Haranhalli MD BA; Andrew Joshua Kobets MD, MHS; Rafael De la Garza Ramos MD; David J. Altschul MD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2018 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: The standard trans-femoral artery (TFA) approach for access for mechanical thrombectomy in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) often proves difficult and can delay recanalization, leading to less favorable outcomes. Aortic arch tortuosity represents a common cause for this delay. There are a growing number of case series using transradial artery (TRA) and/or transcervical carotid artery (TCCA) access demonstrating these methods to be safe with low rates of post-procedural morbidity.

    Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles were identified through the Ovid Medline and Web of Science databases from inception to March 2018, as well as our center’s unpublished data.

    Results: Eleven studies encompassing 51 patients were included (all observational cohorts). Initial NIHSS score ranged from 1-36, average 17.6. 39 (76%) patients suffered from anterior circulation versus 12 posterior circulation occlusions. Access site included 26 (51%) radial artery punctures, 23 (45%) percutaneous cervical-carotid punctures, 1 brachial and 1 direct vertebral artery puncture. The average time from symptom onset to first pass/recanalization was 387.6 minutes (n=33, 95%CI 310.6-464.6). The average puncture to recanalization time was 40.7 minutes (n=41, 95%CI 32.7-48). Technical success defined as TICI score of 2b or greater - achieved in 43/51 (84%) of patients. There were no documented complications in patients who underwent TRA access and only 2 (8.7%) treated via TCCA access developed hematomas, one resolved with conservative management.

    Conclusions: This study summarizes the best available evidence for alternative access in interventional AIS treatment, and demonstrates the safety and success possible with TRA or TCCA catheterization. Guidelines to prospectively identify patients that will need extra-femoral access, development of devices tailored for alternative access, and further standardization of these techniques will be indispensable for significant advancements in the field.

    Patient Care: Raise awareness about these alternative methods for stroke access. Considering that the complications are infrequent and trivial when compared to the possible benefits provided by thrombectomy for these patients, we need to focus on minimizing the time from symptom onset to recanalization. Further research into these methods can also identify factors favoring certain patients for alternative access from the start of the procedure.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) Describe the importance of timely recanalization in AIS treatment for outcomes 2) Identify alternative/extra-femoral methods for access in mechanical thrombectomy

    References: Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GGL, De Benedictis ML, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures: Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(2):349-356. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.034. 2. Bendok BR, Przybylo JH, Parkinson R, Hu Y, Awad IA, Batjer HH. Neuroendovascular interventions for intracranial posterior circulation disease via the transradial approach: Technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2005;56(3):626. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000154820.28342.38. 3. Blanc R, Piotin M, Mounayer C, Spelle L, Moret J. Direct cervical arterial access for intracranial endovascular treatment. Neuroradiology. 2006;48(12):925-929. doi:10.1007/s00234-006-0157-1. 4. Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1989;16(1):3-7. doi:10.1002/ccd.1810160103. 5. Castaño C, Remollo S, García MR, Hidalgo C, Hernández-Perez M, Ciorba M. Mechanical thrombectomy with “ADAPT” technique by transcervical access in acute ischemic stroke. Neuroradiol J. 2015;28(6):617-622. doi:10.1177/1971400915609352. 6. Desai JA, Almekhlafi MA, Hill MD, Goyal M, Eesa M. Ultrasound guided V3 segment vertebral artery direct percutaneous puncture for basilar artery mechanical thrombectomy in acute stroke: a technical report. Case Reports. 2013;2013(mar27 1):bcr2012010601-bcr2012010601. doi:10.1136/bcr-2012-010601. 7. Eichhöfer J, Horlick E, Ivanov J, et al. Decreased complication rates using the transradial compared to the transfemoral approach in percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of routine stenting and glycoprotein platelet IIb/IIIa inhibitor use: A large single-center experience. Am Heart J. 2008;156(5):864-870. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2008.06.044. 8. Eskioglu E, Burry M V, Mericle R a. Transradial approach for neuroendovascular surgery of intracranial vascular lesions. J Neurosurg. 2004;101(5):767-769. doi:10.3171/jns.2004.101.5.0767. 9. Etxegoien N, Rhyne D, Kedev S, Sachar R, Mann T. The transradial approach for carotid artery stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;80(7):1081-1087. doi:10.1002/ccd.24503. 10. Ferrante G, Rao S V., Jüni P, et al. Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Interventions Across the Entire Spectrum of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(14):1419-1434. doi:10.1016/J.JCIN.2016.04.014. 11. Fessler RD, Wakhloo AK, Lanzino G, Guterman LR, Hopkins LN. Transradial approach for vertebral artery stenting: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2000;46(6):1524-7-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10834658. 12. Fischman AM, Swinburne NC, Patel RS. A Technical Guide Describing the Use of Transradial Access Technique for Endovascular Interventions. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;18(2):58-65. doi:10.1053/j.tvir.2015.04.002. 13. Goland J, Doroszuk G, Garbugino S, Ypa M. Transradial approach to treating endovascular cerebral aneurysms: Case series and technical note. Surg Neurol Int. 2017;8(1):73. doi:10.4103/sni.sni_393_16. 14. Gould PL, Peyton WT, French LA. Vertebral Angiography by Retrograde Injection of the Brachial Artery. J Neurosurg. 1955;12(4):369-374. doi:10.3171/jns.1955.12.4.0369. 15. Hassan AE, Chaudhry SA, Miley JT, et al. Microcatheter to recanalization (procedure time) predicts outcomes in endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke: When do we stop? Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34(2):354-359. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3202. 16. Haussen DC, Nogueira RG, DeSousa KG, et al. Transradial access in acute ischemic stroke intervention. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8(3):247-250. doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011519. 17. Hinck VC, Judkins MP, Paxton HD. Simplified Selective Femorocerebral Angiography. Radiology. 1967;89(6):1048-1052. doi:10.1148/89.6.1048. 18. Hospital AS. No Title. :955-971. 19. Jadhav AP, Ribo M, Grandhi R, et al. Transcervical access in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6(9):652-657. doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010971. 20. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9775):1409-1420. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2. 21. Kaymaz Z, Nikoubashman O, Brockmann M, Wiesmann M, Brockmann C. Influence of carotid tortuosity on internal carotid artery access time in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Interv Neuroradiol. 2017;23(6):583-588. doi:10.1177/1591019917729364. 22. Khatri P, Abruzzo T, Yeatts SD, Nichols C, Broderick JP, Tomsick T a. Good clinical outcome after ischemic stroke with successful revascularization is time-dependent. Neurology. 2009;73<BR>(13<BR>):1066-72<BR>. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b9c847. 23. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ. Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation. Am Heart J. 1994;128(1):167-174. doi:10.1016/0002-8703(94)90023-X. 24. Leeds NE, Kieffer SA. Evolution of diagnostic neuroradiology from 1904 to 1999. Radiology. 2000;217(2):309-318. doi:10.1148/radiology.217.2.r00nv45309. 25. Levy EI, Boulos AS, Fessler RD, et al. Transradial Cerebral Angiography: An Alternative Route. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(2):335-342. doi:10.1227/00006123-200208000-00007. 26. Levy EI, Kim SH, Bendok BR, et al. Transradial stenting of the cervical internal carotid artery: Technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2003;53(2):448-452. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000073995.81018.2B. 27. Matsumoto Y, Hokama M, Nagashima H, et al. Transradial approach for selective cerebral angiography: Technical note. Neurol Res. 2000;22(6):605-608. doi:10.1080/01616412.2000.11740727. 28. Mazighi M, Chaudhry SA, Ribo M, et al. Impact of onset-to-reperfusion time on stroke mortality: A collaborative pooled analysis. Circulation. 2013;127(19):1980-1985. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000311. 29. Mokin M, Snyder K V, Levy EI, Hopkins LN, Siddiqui AH. Direct carotid artery puncture access for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke: technical aspects, advantages, and limitations. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7(2):108-113. doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-011007. 30. Oselkin M, Satti S, Sundararajan S, Kung D, Hurst R, Pukenas B. Endovascular treatment for acute basilar thrombosis via a transradial approach: Initial experience and future considerations. Interv Neuroradiol. 2017:159101991773370. doi:10.1177/1591019917733709. 31. Powers WJ, Derdeyn CP, Biller J, et al. 2015 American Heart Association/American stroke association focused update of the 2013 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke regarding endovascular treatment: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American . Stroke. 2015;46(10):3020-3035. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000074. 32. Ratib K, Mamas MA, Routledge HC, Ludman PF, Fraser D, Nolan J. Influence of access site choice on incidence of neurologic complications after percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J. 2013;165(3):317-324. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2012.10.015. 33. Reznik ME, Espinosa-Morales AD, Jumaa MA, Zaidi S, Ducruet AF, Jadhav AP. Endovascular thrombectomy in the setting of aortic dissection. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9(1):17-20. doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012397. 34. Reznik ME, Espinosa-Morales AD, Jumaa MA, Zaidi S, Ducruet AF, Jadhav AP. Endovascular thrombectomy in the setting of aortic dissection. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9(1):17-20. doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012397. 35. Ribo M, Flores A, Rubiera M, et al. Difficult catheter access to the occluded vessel during endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke is associated with worse clinical outcome. J Neurointerv Surg. 2013;5(suppl 1):i70-i73. doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010438. 36. Ribo M, Molina CA, Jankowitz B, et al. Stentrievers versus other endovascular treatment methods for acute stroke: comparison of procedural results and their relationship to outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6(4):265-269. doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010748. 37. Roche AD, Murphy B, Adams N, Sheahan R, Brennan P, Looby S. Direct Common Carotid Artery Puncture for Endovascular Treatment of Acute Large Vessel Ischemic Stroke in a Patient with Aortic Coarctation. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;26(11):e211-e213. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.07.017. 38. Sirker A, Kwok CS, Kotronias R, et al. Influence of access site choice for cardiac catheterization on risk of adverse neurological events: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2016;181:107-119. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2016.06.027. 39. Spiotta AM, Vargas J, Turner R, Chaudry MI, Battenhouse H, Turk AS. The golden hour of stroke intervention: effect of thrombectomy procedural time in acute ischemic stroke on outcome. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6(7):511-516. doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010726. 40. Sur S, Snelling B, Khandelwal P, et al. Transradial approach for mechanical thrombectomy in anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;42(4):E13. doi:10.3171/2017.1.FOCUS16525. 41. Wiesmann M, Kalder J, Reich A, et al. Feasibility of combined surgical and endovascular carotid access for interventional treatment of ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8(6):571-575. doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011719. 42. Yoo AJ, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Jovin TG. Future directions in IAT: Better studies, better selection, better timing and better techniques. J Neurointerv Surg. 2013;5(SUPPL.1). doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010741.

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy