Skip to main content
  • Complications Leading to Reoperation Following Intracranial Tumors Surgery: An Analysis of the Single Center Data

    Final Number:
    1048

    Authors:
    Yong Liu; Yan Qu; Guodong Gao; Hua Zhang; Xue Jiang; Jinghui Liu; Miao Lou; Bei Liu; Weiwen Wang; Liang Wang

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2018 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Removing the tumor and obtaining a pathological diagnosis are the aim of surgery for intracranial tumors. However, operations are not without inherent risks. Some several complications including large hematoma and malignant brain edema are life-threatening and require the intervention of reoperation.

    Methods: Patients undergoing elective surgery for the intracranial tumor at Tangdu Hospital from 2014 to 2017 were included. Complications leading to reoperation were collected and analyzed for patient and tumor characteristics, and early outcomes.

    Results: 122 patients including 48 males and 74 females received the reoperation for postoperative several complications. The rate of reoperation was less than 1%. Median age was 54.5y (range, 3-84y). Pathological diagnoses included 36 gliomas, 45 meningiomas, 11 pituitary adenomas, 9 schwannomas, 5 craniopharyngiomas, and 16 other tumors. The maximal diameter of tumors ranged from 1.6 to 8.9cm (median 4.1cm). 100 patients obtained total resections, 20 subtotal resections and 2 partial resections. Hematoma (88 cases) was the most frequent complication, followed by brain edema (22), CSF leakage from the wound (9), and wound infection (3). Urgent reoperation was performed from 3.0 to 510.5 hours (median 29.9 h) after primary surgery. Median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score before reoperation and on discharge were 6.5 and 15. Median hospital stay after reoperation was 10 days (range, 1-90d). However, median KPS score representing patient’s physical status declined on discharge compared with the score on admission, 40 vs. 80 respectively. Mortality after reoperation was 15.4% (19 patients).

    Conclusions: Close monitoring should be performed for finding the complications. Reoperation was the life-saving treatment for these severe complications. The mortality of complications leading to reoperation was was high. Pessimistically, physical status still continued to deteriorate after reoperation compared with the status on admission. It’s important to weigh the risks of surgery against the presumed advantages.

    Patient Care: It’s important to weigh the risks of surgery against the presumed advantages.

    Learning Objectives: The objective of this study was to summarize the complications leading to reoperation following intracranial tumors surgery.

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy