In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Evaluating Auras as Predictors of Post Surgical Outcomes in Patients with Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy who Underwent an Anterior Temporal Lobectomy

    Final Number:
    822

    Authors:
    Luis Rendon; Sarah KB Bick MD; Emad N. Eskandar MD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2018 Annual Meeting - Late Breaking Science

    Introduction: Epilepsy affects close to 2.5 to 3 million people. The majority of those patients suffer from temporal lobe epilepsy associated with mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS). These patients often report a variety of sensations called auras prior to ictal events. In this study, we investigated how preoperative MRI and pathological findings relate to the different types of auras, and examine those auras for their predictive value of postsurgical outcome

    Methods: Patients who underwent anterior temporal lobectomies (n = 275) from 1993 to 2016 at Massachusetts General Hospital were retrospectively reviewed with an average length of follow up of 8.24 years.

    Results: 57.96% of the patients for whom data was available are currently seizure free, while 42.04% relapsed. 195 (86%) of patients reported experiencing auras whereas 32 (14.1%) patients denied auras of any type. Notably, 60 patients reported epigastric auras (26.43%), 34 patients reported somatosensory auras (14.97%), and 22 patients (9.69%) reported gustatory auras. A preoperative MRI finding of mesial temporal sclerosis (n = 135), comprised 49.09% of all cases and was significantly associated with epigastric auras (p < 0.01). Additionally, epigastric auras (p < 0.05) and a younger surgical age (p <0.05) were predictors of better Engel scores whereas gustatory auras (p < 0.05), a history of brain surgery (p < 0.05), and prior febrile seizures (p < 0.01) indicated worse outcomes. An MTS pathological finding was significantly associated with epigastric (p < 0.05), somatosensory auras (p < 0.05) and no auras (p < 0.05), whereas MTS negatively correlated with auditory auras (p < 0.01).

    Conclusions: Our results indicate that auras contain valuable predictive information regarding not only the pathological foci specific to patients’ epilepsy, but also expected outcomes following surgical intervention. Physicians should consistently inquire about auras in order to optimize and individualize care to their patients.

    Patient Care: As work elucidates the pathological mechanisms responsible for the presence of particular auras, physicians will be able to tailor their care to patients’ individual disease state. Our work establishes important relationships and defining features related to the pathological extent and predictive value of certain auras. The information uncovered in the study could guide physicians’ and patients’ decision making as it pertains to pursuing surgical intervention.

    Learning Objectives: At the end of the session, participants should be able to: 1) Identify diagnostic factors that predict better outcomes following an anterior temporal lobectomy, 2) Discuss the pathological relevance related to particular auras, and 3) Utilize the information provided to the improve management of patients with medication refractory epilepsy.

    References: 1, Téllez-Zenteno, J.F. and Hernández-Ronquillo, L. A review of the epidemiology of temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Research and Treatment. 2012, 630853 (2012). 2.Babb, T.L. and Brown, W.J. Pathological findings in epilepsy, in: J. Engel Jr. (Ed.), Surgical Treatment of the Epilepsies. Raven Press. 511–540 (1987). 3. Mathern, G.W. et al. Hippocampal neuron damage in human epilepsy: Meyer’s hypothesis revisited. Progress in Brain Research. 135, 237-251 (2002). 4. Engel Jr. et al. Early surgical therapy for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy: a randomized trial. JAMA. 307(9), 922–930 (2012). 5. Pauli, C. et al. Predictors of meaningful improvement in quality of life after temporal lobe epilepsy surgery: A prospective study. Epilepsia. 58(5), 755-763 (2017). 6. Roberti, F. et al. Tailored anteromedial lobectomy in the treatment of refractory epilepsy of the temporal lobe: long term surgical outcome and predictive factors. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 109(2), 158-165 (2007). 7. Falowski, S.M. et al. Tailored temporal lobectomy for medically intractable epilepsy: Evaluation of pathology and predictors of outcome. Neurosurgery. 7(3), 703-709 (2012). 8. Blume W.T. et al. Glossary of descriptive terminology for ictal semiology: report of the ILAE task force on classification and terminology. Epilepsia. 42(9), 1212–1218 (2001). 9. Asadi-Pooya A.A. et al. Auras in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy and mesial temporal sclerosis. Journal of Neurological Sciences. 364, 24-26 (2016). 10. Foldvary-Schaefer, N. and anUnnwongse, K. Localizing and lateralizing features of auras and seizures. Epilepsy Behavior. 20(2), 160–166 (2011). 11. Barba, C. et al. Ictal clinical and scalp-EEG findings differentiating temporal lobe epilepsies from temporal ‘plus’ epilepsies. Brain. 130, 1957-1967 (2007). 12. Buren, J.M. The abdominal aura. A study of abdominal sensations occurring in epilepsy and produced by depth stimulation. Electroencephalographic Clinical Neurophysiology. 15, 1–19 (1963). 13. Kuan, Y.C. et al. Abdominal auras in patients with mesial temporal sclerosis. Epilepsy and Behavior. 25, 386-390 (2012). 14. Benarroch, E.E. The central autonomic network: functional organization, dysfunction, and perspective. Mayo Clin Proc. 68, 988–1001 (1993). ? 15. Penfield, W., Faulk. Jr. M.E. The insula; further observations on its function. Brain. 78, 445-470 (1995). 16. Penfield, W., Jasper, H.H., and McNaughton, F. Epilepsy and the functional anatomy of the human brain. London: Churchill. (1954). 17. Wang, G.J., et al. Gastric distention activates satiety circuitry in the human brain. Neuroimage. 39, 1824-1831 (2008). 18. Moisset, X., et al. Anatomical connections between brain areas activated during rectal distension in healthy volunteers: a visceral pain network. European Journal of Pain. 14, 142-148 (2010). 19. Dupont, S. et al. Are auras a reliable indicator in medial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippomcapal sclerosis? European Journal of Neurology. 22, 1310-1316 (2015). 20. Asadi-Pooya A.A. et al. Type of preoperative aura may predict postsurgical outcome in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy and mesial temporal sclerosis. Epilepsy and Behavior. 50, 98-100 (2015). 21. Erickson, et al. Somatosensory auras in refractory temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 47, 202–206 (2006). 22. Tuxhorn, I.E. Somatosensory auras in focal epilepsy: a clinical, video EEG and MRI study. Seizure. 14, 262–268 (2005). 23. Aghakhani, Y et al. Patients with temporoparietal ictal symptoms and inferomesial EEG do not benefit from anterior temporal resection. Epilepsia. 45, 230–236 (2004). 24. Perven, G. et al. The relevance of somatosensory auras in refractory temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 56(10), 143-148 (2015). 25. N. Foldvary-Schaefer, K. Unnwongse, Localizing and lateralizing features of auras and seizures, Epilepsy and Behavior. 20, 160–166 (2011) 26. Kotagal, P. Seizure symptomatology of temporal lobe epilepsy. In: Lüders HO, ed. Epilepsy surgery. Raven Press: New York. 143–157 (1991).

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy