On October 1, 2021 the CNS is proud to announce a new and improved user experience for all your SANS education needs. You’ll retain access to any current subscriptions
but answers on exams won’t transfer over - so make sure you complete any exams and claim credit by September 30 or start the new SANS 2021 today

  • Quantitative Outcomes of Endoscopic Strip Craniectomy For Metopic Craniosynostosis

    Final Number:
    661

    Authors:
    Orgest Lajthia BS; Chima Oluigbo MD; John S. Myseros MD; Robert F. Keating MD; Gary Rogers MD; Suresh N. Magge MD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2017 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: The goal of this study was to present quantitative results of early treatment of infants with metopic craniosynostosis using endoscopic strip craniectomy with postoperative helmet therapy, with over 2 year follow-up.

    Methods: This was an IRB-approved, retrospective study to examine the results of consecutive patients with metopic craniosynostosis who had undergone minimally invasive endoscopic strip craniectomy followed by helmet therapy. Preoperative and follow-up clinical parameters were collected from patient charts. The severity of trigonocephaly was assessed by measuring the interfrontal angle (IFA), as described by Wood et al on preoperative CT 3D reconstructions as well as 2D pictures both pre- and postoperatively.

    Results: There were 7 patients (4 male, 3 female), mean age at surgery 2.76 months (range 1.8 to 4.1 months), with mean follow-up of 2.02 years. Mean operative time was 91.4 minutes and mean EBL was 57.1 ml. Mean length of stay was 1.14 days. Trigonocephaly was significantly improved from a preoperative IFA of 118.8 degrees to 135.4 degrees in follow-up (p<0.01). The mean IFA in follow-up was within normal limits. Head circumference percentile was not significantly changed in follow-up. There was a statistically significant improvement in the inner-to-outer canthal distance ratio (p<0.01) in follow-up, showing an improvement in hypotelorism. There were no dural tears, CSF leaks, infections, or other significant morbidities, and there were no serious complications related to the use of helmet therapy. All patients achieved excellent aesthetic results judged by photograph comparisons.

    Conclusions: This study showed quantitative improvement, using IFA, in patients treated with endoscopic strip craniectomy for metopic craniosynostosis at over 2 year follow-up. Endoscopic strip craniectomy for metopic craniosynostosis is a safe and effective treatment associated with excellent results.

    Patient Care: The rate of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis in the newborn population has been estimated at 0.5/1000 live births, with 5% to 10% of these involving the metopic suture. The relative rarity of the condition and lack of standardized outcome reporting offer limited support for any specific management regiment, thus making the treatment of cranial and facial deformational changes associated with the disorder particularly challenging for the surgeon. Traditional surgical treatments have been around for many years but the majority of these operations are lengthy and require significant blood transfusions. Our study supports the use of endoscopic strip craniectomy and postoperative helmet therapy as an alternative option that not only offers excellent results but also has the added benefit of low complication rates and short hospital stay. Our results also suggest that IFA could be used as an objective measure to evaluate frontal cranial vault deformity and its postoperative correction.

    Learning Objectives: 1) Describe the role of endoscopic strip craniectomy in the treatment of infants with metopic synostosis as a safe and effective therapeutic alternative associated with excellent results. 2) Identify IFA as an objective measure that could be used by clinicians to assess cranial deformity and its correction postoperatively. 3) Recognize the advantages of endoscopic strip craniectomy with regard to minimal blood loss, decreased length of stay, and low complication rates.

    References: 1. Wood BC, Mendoza CS, Oh AK, Myers E, Safdar N, Linguraru MG, et al: What's in a name? accurately diagnosing metopic craniosynostosis using a computational approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 137:205-213, 2016

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy