Skip to main content
  • An Acute Biomechanical Study of Plate-cage Fixation for OLIF

    Final Number:

    Kirk McGilvray, PhD (1); Hal Silcox, MD (2); Jeremy Rawlinson, PhD (3); Christian M. Puttlitz, PhD (1)

    Study Design:
    Laboratory Investigation

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2017 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) utilizes a surgical path to the disc space anterior to the psoas muscle and lateral to the great vessels to avoid iatrogenic injury to the psoas muscle and lumbar plexus. This minimally invasive technique typically allows for narrow or wide intervertebral cages. The objective of this study was to assess the cadaveric biomechanical stability afforded by an OLIF approach as a function of cage size and the use of supplemental fixation with anterior plates or posterior pedicle screws and rods.

    Methods: Sixteen lumbar (L1-L5) spine sections were utilized. The spines were tested using a standard flexibility protocol under a 6Nm moment. Wide (27mm) and narrower (20mm) cages were placed in the L3-L4 intervertebral space and tested: (1) as is, (2) with a 2-hole plate, (3) with a 4-hole plate, or (4) with bilateral pedicle screws. Plate location was varied between lateral and oblique.

    Results: The instrumented spines demonstrated significantly (p<0.03) reduced flexion-extension and lateral bending range-of-motion (ROM) as compared to intact. The narrower cage delivered equivalent (p>0.05) flexion-extension ROM at the implanted level as compared to the wider cage. The addition of bilateral pedicle screws and rods to the narrower cage alone did not produce significant reductions in flexion-extension or lateral bending ROM. The constructs with a 4-hole plate produced insignificant reductions in flexion-extension (p>0.19) as compared to the 2-hole plate variants. Plate placement (lateral vs oblique) did not result in significant changes to the flexion-extension, lateral bending, or axial rotation ROM. There were no statistically significant changes in adjacent (L2-L3) segment motion as compared to the intact condition.

    Conclusions: The data indicate that the OLIF approach provides equivalent acute stability as compared to current anterior and posterior instrumentation strategies, and, therefore, should be considered as a technique for obtaining solid spinal fixation.

    Patient Care: This research provides biomechanical comparisons of implant placement when surgeons consider fixation for patients undergoing interbody fusion.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to understand the biomechanical effects associated with supplemental fixation when utilizing an OLIF technique.


We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy