Skip to main content
  • En bloc Resection of Glioblastoma is Independently Associated with Improved Outcomes

    Final Number:

    Wajd Al-Holou MD; Tiffany R. Hodges MD; Richard George Everson MD; Jacob Freeman MD; Shouhua Zhou; Dima Suki PhD; Ganesh Rao MD; Sherise D. Ferguson MD; Amy B. Heimberger MD; Ian E. McCutcheon MD; Sujit S. Prabhu MD, FRCS; Frederick F. Lang MD; Jeffrey S. Weinberg MD; Raymond Sawaya MD

    Study Design:

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2017 Annual Meeting - Late Breaking Science

    Introduction: Surgical resection is a critical component in the initial treatment of glioblastoma(GBM). En bloc resection(EBR) of the contrast-enhancing portion has been described in the literature but with limited data. Therefore, we undertook a retrospective analysis to test whether EBR produced a greater extent of resection.

    Methods: We identified all patients with a newly diagnosed GBM who underwent resection at MD Anderson from 6/1/1993 to 12/31/2015. Demographics, presenting symptoms, intraoperative data, method of resection(en bloc vs. piecemeal),postoperative outcomes, and volumetric imaging data were obtained. Complete resection(CR) was defined as 100% resection of all enhancing disease. EBR was defined as removal of a tumor as a single specimen using a circumferential technique. A neurological complication was counted if the patient developed new/worsening neurological deficits postoperatively. Multivariate analyses were performed using propensity-score weighted multivariate logistical regression.

    Results: We identified 1204 patients who underwent resection for a newly diagnosed GBM. 436 cases(36%) were resected using an EBR and 766 cases(64%) were resected using a piecemeal technique. CR was achieved in 69% of cases. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that EBR was associated with a significantly higher rate of CR compared to piecemeal resection(81% vs 62%, respectively)(OR=2.4,95% CI:1.8-3.3,p<0.001). Postoperative neurological complications occurred in 13% of patients. In a multivariate analysis, EBR was associated with a significantly lower rate of neurological complications compared with piecemeal resection(9% vs 15%, respectively)(Odds ratio=0.6,95% CI:0.4-0.9,p=0.028). We performed a subgroup analysis of tumors located in eloquent cortex. Multivariate analysis of this subgroup showed that EBR had a significantly higher rate of CR(79% vs 58%, p<0.001), and a lower rate of neurological complications(11% vs 20%, p=0.018) compared to piecemeal resection.

    Conclusions: EBR of GBM is associated with significantly higher rates of CR and lower rates of neurological complications, even for tumors arising in eloquent locations. Use of an EBR technique should be considered when resecting GBMs.

    Patient Care: This research describes the benefits of an en bloc resection technique for GBM that can be used to improve outcomes for these patients.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to 1) Understand that en bloc resesction of GBM is feasible and should be considered, 2)Understand that en bloc resection is feasible and safe in eloquent brain, 3)Understand that en bloc resection of GBM is associated with a significantly higher rate of complete resection with lower rates of neurological complications.


We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy