Skip to main content
  • How Does Case Type, Length of Stay, and Comorbidities Affect Medicare DRG Reimbursement for Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) for Deformity?

    Final Number:

    Pierce Nunley; Richard Fessler; Paul Park; Joseph Zavatsky; Gregory Mundis; Juan Uribe; Robert Eastlack; Stacie Nguyen; Dean Chou; Michael Wang; Neel Anand; Adam Kanter; Christopher Shaffrey; Praveen Mummaneni; ISSG

    Study Design:

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2016 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: We investigated Medicare DRG based reimbursement for MIS deformity procedures in our study group hospitals based on length of stay and presence of comorbid conditions (CC).

    Methods: DRG based reimbursement was obtained for MIS anterior, posterior and circumferential 1-level and multi-level fusion for listhesis and deformity cases with and without CC from 12 institutions throughout the US. The 3 most common MIS procedures were analyzed to compare reimbursement based on DRG coding: 1. Fusion via anterior or posterior only; 2. Fusion anterior with fixation posterior percutaneous (no dorsal fusion); 3. Fusion Combined anterior and posterior.

    Results: The number of levels fused does not affect the reimbursement for all cases. Cases 1 and 2 without CC, 3-day stay reimbursed $41,404 vs 8-day reimbursed $42,808. Cases 1 and 2 with CCs, 3-day stay reimbursed $54,476 vs 8-day stay reimbursed $55,881. Case 3 without CC, 3-day stay reimbursed $47,992 vs 8-day stay reimbursed $49,397. Case 3 with CC, 3-day reimbursed $61,806 vs 8-day reimbursed $63,212. The increased payment for an 8-day stay was $1,405 or $281 per day. If a deformity case 1 or 2 is coded incorrectly as a degenerative case the decrease in payment was $9,769 lower (-24%) with no CC and $22,841 lower (-42%) with CC.

    Conclusions: Regardless the direct costs, Medicare DRG based reimbursement was the same for single and multi-level MIS deformity cases. The use of posterior percutaneous fixation without dorsal fusion resulted in a 13-16% lower reimbursement compared with the addition of a posterior arthrodesis. Coding a deformity case as degenerative by the hospital resulted in 24-42% lower DRG based reimbursement. In today’s challenging environment it is important that physicians and hospitals better understand procedure and coding issues in order to be able to continue to offer complex spinal surgeries cost effectively to our patients.

    Patient Care: N/A

    Learning Objectives: Hospital DRG coding and reimbursement is a separate system from physician professional CPT coding, billing and collecting and reimbursement. There exist several distinct differences that significantly affect hospital reimbursement. For example: Deformity coding was critical and resulted in reimbursement losses of 24% to 42% if not coded properly. We present these differences and most importantly how case type, length of stay, and concomitant medical comorbidities effect hospital reimbursement in spinal deformity surgery for MIS deformity techniques.


We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy