In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Comparative Analysis of Standard Discectomy With Extraforaminal Discectomy

    Final Number:
    1302

    Authors:
    Parth Kothari BS; Javier Z Guzman BS; Samuel K Cho MD; Nathan John Lee BS; John I Shin BS; Branko Skovrlj MD; Jeremy Steinberger MD; Dante Leven DO

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2015 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Discectomy is one of the most common spine procedure performed and has been supported by several long-term studies. Relatively low complication rates are reported, though reoperation rates are as high as 30%. Standard discectomy (SD) and extraforaminal discectomy (ED) are the most frequently performed procedures for lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP), though few studies have compared these procedures with regard to postoperative complications using a large database.

    Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the NSQIP database. Patients > 18 years old undergoing elective SD or ED between 2005 and 2012 were included. Patient baseline factors, perioperative data, preoperative labs, and postoperative events were recorded. Patients in the two cohorts were compared using multivariate logistic regression analysis with significance defined as p < 0.05. Odds ratio (OR) was calculated with a 95% confidence interval.

    Results: During the study period 4241 patients underwent SD and 157 underwent ED. Patients undergoing ED were slightly younger (57.4 vs 55, p=0.03) and more likely to be done as an outpatient procedure (45.8% vs 58.0%, p=0.006). Patient comorbidities were not significantly different between the two groups (all p>0.05). Rate of any complication was 1.9% in the SD group and 1.3% in the ED group with no deaths reported. Higher rates of operative time > 4 hours was noted comparing SD to ED (1.7% vs 4.5%, p=0.01), though when the cohorts were propensity matched this was non-significant (p=0.07). All postoperative complications, mortality, reoperation, unplanned readmission, length of stay (LOS), rate of graft failure and blood transfusion were similar between the two cohorts (p>0.05).

    Conclusions: This investigation provides a comparison of patients undergoing elective SD and ED from a large database and demonstrates low postoperative complication rates. Patients undergoing ED tended to be younger and were more likely to be performed in an outpatient setting, though complications and reoperation rates were similar between the two groups in the immediate postoperative phase.

    Patient Care: Understanding potential benefits or risks of SD and ED will help surgeons determine which approach is best for a particular patient indicated for discectomy.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to differences between patients and outcomes undergoing standard vs extraforaminal discectomy.

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy