In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Comparison of Surgical Outcomes After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Does the Intra-operative Use of a Microscope Improve Surgical Outcomes

    Final Number:
    1287

    Authors:
    Owoicho Adogwa M.D. M.P.H; Aladine Elsamadicy BE; Elizabeth W Reiser BA; Rupen Desai; Cole Ziegler BS; Joseph S. Cheng MD, MS; Isaac O. Karikari MD; Robert E. Isaacs MD; Carlos Antonio Bagley MD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2015 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one of the more commonly performed spinal procedures, with excellent outcomes and very low complication rates. While the intra-operative use of a microscope during this procedure improves visualization, its impact on clinical outcomes remains unclear. Whether the use of a microscope leads superior outcomes remain unknown.

    Methods: 140 adult patients (non-microscope cohort: 81 cases, Microscope cohort: 59 cases) undergoing ACDF at Duke University Medical Center by the senior authors (R.I & C.B) were included in this study. Enrollment criteria included available demographic, surgical and clinical outcome data. All patients had prospectively collected patient reported outcomes measures and a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients completed the Neck Disability Index(NDI ), Short-Form 12(SF-12) and Visual Analog Pain Scale(VAS) before surgery, then at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Clinical outcomes and complication rates were compared between both patient cohorts.

    Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between both cohorts, Table 1. The median [inter quartile range] number of levels fused was similar between both patient cohorts 2[1-2],p=0.56. The mean±Standard Deviation duration of surgery was longer in the microscope cohort (Microscope cohort:169±34 minutes vs. non-microscope cohort: 98±42 minutes,p<0.001), Table 2. There was no significant difference between cohorts in the incidence of nerve root injury(p=0.99) or incidental durotomy(p=0.32), Table 2. At 3 months post-operatively, both cohorts demonstrated similar improvement in VAS-neck pain(p=0.69), NDI(p=0.86), SF-12 PCS(p=0.84) and SF-12 MCS(p=0.75), Table 3. These results were durable through 2-years. At 2-years post-operatively, both the microscope and non-microscope cohorts demonstrated similar improvement from base line in NDI (Microscope cohort:13.52±25.77 vs. non-microscope cohort:19.51± 27.47,p<0.18), SF-12 PCS (Microscope cohort:4.15±26.39 vs. non-microscope cohort:11.98±22.96,p<0.07),SF-12 MCS (Microscope cohort: 9.47 ± 32.38 vs. non-microscope cohort:16.19±30.44,p<0.21), Figure 1. Interestingly at 2-years, the change in VAS neck pain score was significantly different between cohorts (Microscope cohort:2.22±4.00 vs. non-microscope cohort:3.69±3.61,p<0.02).

    Conclusions: The intra-operative use of a microscope enhances the visualization of surgical anatomy, however, the results of this study indicate that it does not improve overall surgery-related outcomes nor does it lead to superior long-term outcomes in pain and functional disability, tow-years after index surgery

    Patient Care: It will improve patient care by allowing surgeons to understand that the the use and extra costs of an intra-operative microscope for ACDF procedures does not lead to more superior outcomes. Therefore, it will allow for a reduction in the extra costs for an intra-operative microscope.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) Describe the importance of the use of an intra-operative microscope for ACDF procedures and its relation to superior outcomes, 2) Discuss, in small groups, techniques that utilizes the use of an intra-operative microscope for ACDF procedures, 3) Identify an effective treatment technique with or without the use of an intra-operative microscope that can lead to superior outcomes.

    References: 1. Reginald S. Fayssoux, Choll W. Kim. (2013) Minimally invasive decompression. Seminars in Spine Surgery 25, 146-153. 2. Hankinson HL, Wilson CB: Use of the operating microscope in anterior cervical discectomy without fusion. J Neurosurg 43:452-456, 1975 3. Cauthen JC, Kinard RE, Vogler JB, Jackson DE, DePaz OB, Hunter OL, et al: Outcome analysis of noninstrumented anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion in 348 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:188-192, 1998 4. Farzad Omidi-Kashani, Ebrahim Ghayem Hasankhani, Reza Ghandehari. (2014) Impact of Age and Duration of Symptoms on Surgical Outcome of Single-Level Microscopic Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in the Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy. Neuroscience Journal 2014, 1-6.

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy