In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • A survey of the effects of aggressive resection and radiotherapy in high-grade meningiomas

    Final Number:
    1497

    Authors:
    Gustavo Chagoya BS; Ranjith Babu MD, MS; Vijay Agarwal MD; Allan H. Friedman MD; D. Cory Adamson MD PhD MPH MHSc

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2014 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: While meningiomas are generally regarded as benign tumors, some have histological characteristics suggestive of more aggressive behavior and may even exhibit infiltrative features. These high-grade meningiomas, WHO grade II (atypical) and grade III (malignant), are difficult to treat and carry a significantly worse prognosis than their grade I counterparts. Due to the rarity of these tumors, few large studies evaluating the effect of both patient and treatment factors on overall survival have been done and even fewer of these have been performed following the latest revision of the WHO diagnostic criteria.

    Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was utilized to identify patients diagnosed with high-grade meningiomas from 2004-2009. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were summarized and analyzed to identify prognostic factors for survival.

    Results: A total of 455 patients met the inclusion criteria of having a diagnosis of high-grade meningioma. The median age was 60 years, with females accounting for 54.7% of patients. The median tumor size was 4.5 centimeters. The majority of patients underwent surgical resection (96.5%), with 49.8% receiving gross total resection. Postoperative radiotherapy was only utilized in 27.4% of patients. One-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 73.4%, 55.0%, and 9.7%, respectively. Age > 65 years (p<0.0001) and gross total resection (p=0.011) significantly impacted survival. Conversely, female gender (p=0.069), tumor size (p=0.099), and radiotherapy (p=0.19) had no effect on patient outcomes. On multivariate analysis, only age > 65 years (HR: 3.52; 95% CI: 2.24-5.53; p<0.0001) and an increased extent of resection (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.38-0.92; p=0.019) were significant prognostic factors.

    Conclusions: Patients with high-grade meningiomas have a poor prognosis overall, with older age conferring even worse survival. Aggressive resection provides the most significant benefit and should be the goal of surgery when feasible. Currently, there is no evidence for the use of radiotherapy in these tumors.

    Patient Care: By identifying significant predictors for survival in patients having high-grade meningioma, therapy can be further optimized to improve outcomes in this population of patients.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) Identify predictors of improved survival for high-grade meningiomas, 2) Be familiar with factors associated with worse prognosis.

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy