In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • A Combined (SKIMS) Approach to Evacuate Acute Subdural Hemorrhage with Underlying Severe Traumatic Brain Edema

    Final Number:
    1725

    Authors:
    Abdul Rashid Bhat MBBS; MS; M Ch Neurosurgery

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2013 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: The conventional (open dural flap) procedure to remove the Acute Subdual Hemorrhage or clot proves dangerous in an acutely traumatic “vent-searching” brain with underlying severe edema, that is restricted in a rigid cranial vault. The new Combined-Approach, known as SKIMS-Approach i.e. “decompressive craniectomy with multi-dural stabs”, between the only decompressive craniectomy and craniectomy plus removal of acute subdural clot by open dural flap (conventional) method, proved much effective in increasing survival of low GCS and severe traumatic brain edema with acute subdural hematoma.

    Methods: This study evaluated prospectively, under a uniform protocol, 225 patients of severe traumatic brain edema with acute subdural hematoma by a combination of wide decompressive craniectomy with multi-dural stabs in 119(cases) patients as against conventional dural opening (open dural flap) and removal of acute subdural hematoma in 106 (controls) patients during a period of 6 years from Jun. 2006 to Jun.2012.

    Results: A free bone flap was elevated and preserved. All patients had GCS (Glasgow Coma Scale) score of 8 and less. The elective ventilation and ICP monitoring was carried out in all patients. Most patients were young and males with a mean age of 30 years in both groups. The overall survival of the Combined-Approach (case-study) was 77.31% (92/119) with good recovery in 42.02% (50/119) and a mortality of 22.69% (27/119) as compared to 46.23% (49/106) survival in open dural flap (control) group with 15.09% (16/106) good recovery and a mortality of 53.77% (57/106).

    Conclusions: The decompressive craniectomy alone is not sufficient and craniectomy with open dural flap is full of risks in such patients. The new innovative and indigenous Combined-Approach is much favorable to the patient outcome.

    Patient Care: The survival of the patients has increased by this new Approach or Technique

    Learning Objectives: *Decompressive craniectomy is not sufficent and open-dural flap method is dangerous *Combined-Approach is the better-alternative

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy