In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • The Biomechanical Consequences Of Rod Reduction Following Facetectomy In The Lumbar Spine

    Final Number:
    1474

    Authors:
    Daniel Gene Kang MD; Ronald A. Lehman MD; Adam J Bevevino MD; Rachel Gaume BS; Paul Happel; Melvin D. Helgeson MD; Anton E. Dmitriev MSc

    Study Design:
    Laboratory Investigation

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2012 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Residual mismatch between pedicle screw-rod constructs is frequently encountered and corrected through rod reduction tools or by readjustment of the screw depth. This study sought to investigate the biomechanical effects of rod reduction and screw re-insertion on the lumbar spine following facetectomy.

    Methods: Nine (n=9) three-segment, human lumbar spine specimens were tested following facetectomy. Pedicles were instrumented with 6.5mm screws and insertional torque (IT) was measured during screw placement. On the left side, a rod with no residual rod-screw mismatch was placed. Then, on the right side an intentional 5mm rod-screw mismatch was contoured and reduced using a rod-reduction device. To simulate screw repositioning, one screw was backed out and reinserted while re-insertional torque was measured. Screws were pulled out “in line” with the screw axis to determine pullout strength (POS) in Newtons (N).

    Results: Rod reduction significantly decreased pedicle screw POS compared to controls (961±352N versus 613±563N). Two of nine screws (22.2%) had outright failure during rod reduction. Screw reinsertion did not significantly decrease POS (943±352N versus 803±422N) despite having a significant decrease in IT compared to control IT (9.56±in-lbs versus 6.38±4.61in-lbs).

    Conclusions: As in the thoracic spine, rod reduction decreases lumbar pedicle screw POS. Increasing the flexibility of the spine, through total facetectomy, does not negate the effects of rod reduction. Despite a significant decrease in IT, screw repositioning/reinsertion did not decrease POS, suggesting that a decreased IT does not affect biomechanical fixation strength. Surgeons should avoid rod reduction devices as they result in decreased screw fixation.

    Patient Care: Surgeons will avoid the rod reduction maneuver in the lumbar spine, or perform the technique with caution to avoid outright pedicle screw failure.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) Describe lumbar facetectomy, 2) Discuss the factors affecting pedicle screw fixation strength, 3) Describe the biomechanical consequences of rod reduction in the lumbar spine

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy