In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Subaxial Cervical Pedicle Screw Fixation. Is it a reasonable alternative?

    Final Number:
    1427

    Authors:
    John M. Duff MD, FACS

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2012 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Subaxial pedicle screw fixation techniques are described using anatomic landmarks and with image guidance. While biomechanically superior to lateral mass screws, there are reservations regarding safety. Standard cervical screws are 3.5 to 4 mm in diameter, and cervical pedicle width is 4.9 to 6.5mm. We review our experience of nineteen patients in whom image guided subaxial pedicle screws have been placed, with CT verified placement accuracy, and complications.

    Methods: Retrospective 5 year review yielded 19 patients who had undergone subaxial cervical pedicle screw placement either alone or as part of a hybrid construct. Typical indications include poor quality bone, lateral mass or pedicle fracture, or the need for three column fixation. We limited our review to C3 to C6 pedicle placements to assess vertebral artery risk. Additionally, the C7 pedicle is often instrumented freehand. All placements were image guided using stereotactic techniques. Screw placements were verified with post-operative CT.

    Results: Out of 131 patients undergoing posterior cervical instrumentation over the study period, 19 patients had a total of 42 pedicle screws placed from C3 to C6 using image guidance. Screw placements were classified as follows. Type 1 with bone surrounding the entire screw, type 1a where the screw thread breeches the pedicle wall, type 2 where the inner diameter of the screw breeches the pedicle wall, type 3 where there is a neurovascular injury. In our study there were 13 type 1 placements, 11 type 1a placements, 18 type 2 placements, and no type 3 placements. Measurements were taken using reconstructed CT images along the axis of each screw, looking down the "barrel" of the pedicle. No clinical complications were noted.

    Conclusions: Image guided cervical subaxial pedicle screw technique appears to be safe. True accuracy can be measured by manipulating CT images along the axis of the pedicle. Cervical pedicle screws are an alternative to lateral mass screw fixation

    Patient Care: Improved cervical spine fixation techniques

    Learning Objectives: Cervical subaxial pedicle screw placement is a viable alternative to standard lateral mass screw placement, and has biomechanical advantages. The technique appears to be safe, although numbers are limited. Accuracy of placement is best measured by manipulating CT images

    References: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Oct 15;30(20):2280-7. Cervical pedicle screws: conventional versus computer-assisted placement of cannulated screws. Richter M, Cakir B, Schmidt R. Source Spine Center, St. Josefs Hospital, Wiesbaden, Germany. mrichter@joho.de Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Apr 15;25(8):962-9. Complications of pedicle screw fixation in reconstructive surgery of the cervical spine. Abumi K, Shono Y, Ito M, Taneichi H, Kotani Y, Kaneda K. Source Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan. abumi@med.hokudai.ac.jp

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy