In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Incidence and anatomical correlation of speech disturbances induced by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in brain tumour patients

    Final Number:
    1362

    Authors:
    Judith Rösler; Birat Niraula; Valerie Strack; Peter Vajkoczy MD; Thomas Picht MD

    Study Design:
    Clinical Trial

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2012 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) has been a very reliable process in locating the motor function regarding the tumours located in the eloquent motor areas of the brain. Recently, TMS helps to locate the speech eloquent areas of the brain in patients with tumours in the perisylvian regions and aids to justify as well as prepare for their forthcoming awake operations. Further more, the cortical stimulation of the brain through TMS, helps in categorizing the different object naming errors performed during the stimulation and in judging the respective neuroanatomical correlates as well as its cortical localisation.

    Methods: 20 Patients suffering from tumors of the dominant perisylvian cortex which were not eligible for awake surgery underwent cortical language mapping with the help of navigated repetitive TMS. Resting Motor Threshold (RMT) for the dominant hemisphere was defined, patients were shown photos of different objects, a baseline naming of objects without stimulation was evaluated and patients were told to name the respective objects during the stimulation. Intensity between 80-120% of RMT and frequency between 5-10Hz with 1sec trains were varied. Different language errors performed by the patients were categorized as: aphasia, performance, phonological, semantic and neologism.

    Results: Altogether 3826 stimulations were performed and 788 errors were noted (20.6%). Among the five gyri stimulated, the error distribution, along with the total number of stimulation were: inferior frontal gyrus 136/754, precentral gyrus 270/1216, postcentral gyrus 146/846, supramarginal gyrus 94/450 and supratemporal gyrus 142/560. 146 Aphasia, 196 performance, 52 phonological, 360 semantic and 34 neologism were altogether seen. Semantic was also the dominant error seen in each of the five respective gyri. The individual maps of language representation were taken into account during surgical planning.

    Conclusions: TMS can be generally used to specify the language dominant hemisphere and to categorize different language errors by the patients with tumours in the perisylvian region of the dominant hemisphere. But the validation of this method is yet to be fully proved and its specification still underlies the direct cortical stimulation.

    Patient Care: A reliable means of mapping the language areas non-invasively will allow us to suggest surgery to patients previously regarded as non-surgical cases.

    Learning Objectives: By the proposed abstract, participants will be motivated to use non-invasive means for mapping of the language cortex in patients not eligible for awake surgery which otherwise might not be operated at all.

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy