In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • The Effect of Vascular Anatomy on Revascularization Rates during Stroke Intervention – Is it Time to Improve Access?

    Final Number:
    229

    Authors:
    Leonardo B. C. Brasiliense MD; Pedro Aguilar-Salinas MD; Christina M. Walter MS; Tania Hassanzadeh BS; Michelle S Nunes; Amin Aghaebrahim; Eric Sauvageau MD; Ricardo A. Hanel MD, PhD; Travis Michael Dumont MD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:
    Ischemic Stroke

    Meeting: AANS/CNS Cerebrovascular Section 2017 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Failure to obtain revascularization remains one of the major pitfalls of mechanical thrombectomy and a topic of concern for the cerebrovascular community. We sought to identify inherent vascular characteristics associated with failed revascularization and suggest a severity scale to predict revascularization rates with current thrombectomy techniques.

    Methods: The authors analyzed a large cohort of patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy during a 3-year period and investigated pre-procedure vascular imaging. The criteria studied were aortic arch type, presence of aortic bovine arch, and tortuosity of the common carotid artery. A 3-point scale was created and correlated with revascularization rates.

    Results: A total of 143 patients were included in the study. In all procedures, a femoral approach was used. All interventions were performed in the anterior circulation (61% M1, 15% M2, 14% ICA, and 10% tandem lesions). The cumulative revascularization rate (TICI 2B-3) was 78.3% (112/143). Patients without aortic arch abnormalities and tortuosity in the CCA had an 84% revascularization rate in contrast to 60% in patients with 2 or more criteria in the vascular severity scale. Intermediate patients (1 criteria) had a 68% revascularization rate.

    Conclusions: Our results suggest that patients with high scores on the vascular severity scale are associated with a much higher rate of failed revascularization. Our scoring system is simple and clinically valuable to predict complex anatomy in which direct carotid access might be considered.

    Patient Care: The current study provides a simple and clinically relevant scale to identify high risk patients for unsuccessful revascularization in stroke. Our goal is to improve patient care by devising alternatives approaches, including direct carotid access for complex patients and increase revascularization rates.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) Understand the importance of successful revascularization during stroke intervention, 2) Recognize patients at high risk for failed revascularization based on vascular imaging, 3) Discuss strategies to mitigate access problems with current thrombectomy techniques

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy