Skip to main content
  • Effect of 90-day Complications on Cost-utility following Lumbar Decompression with and without Fusion for Degenerative Spine Disease

    Final Number:

    Authors:
    Scott L. Parker MD; Silky Chotai MD; Ahilan Sivaganesan MD; John Alexander Sielatycki MD; Joseph Wick; David P Stonko; Matthew J. McGirt MD; Clinton J. Devin MD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves 2016 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Current healthcare system is transitioning from the “fee-for service” to “pay-for performance” model. With this paradigm shift, providers and payers are shifting from quantity to quality, focusing on cost-effective and high quality patient care. Understanding the effect of complications on cost and effectiveness of surgery is vital to understanding its overall impact. We evaluated the effect of complications on cost-utility after lumbar decompression with/ without fusion for degenerative spine disease.

    Methods: 407 consecutive patients undergoing elective surgery for degenerative lumbar pathology were enrolled into prospective longitudinal registry. PROs were recorded at baseline, 3-months, 12-months, and 24-months post-operatively: ODI, NRS-back and leg pain(BP, LP), EQ-5D. Two-year back-related medical resource utilization, missed work, and health state values(quality-adjusted life years[QALYs]) were assessed. Two-year resource use(direct cost) and patient/caregiver workday losses(indirect cost) were calculated. Mean total(direct+indirect) 2-year cost/QALY gained was assessed. Patients were stratified into cohorts based on whether 90-day major complication had occurred(surgical site infection, hardware failure, neurological deficit, pulmonary embolism, hematoma, MI).

    Results: There was significant mean improvement in pain, disability, and quality of life for total cohort 2-years post-operatively(p<0.0001),Table 1. Total 24-month cost was significantly lower in patients without vs. with complication for decompression alone($16,133±8,008 vs. $21,322±9,029, p=0.09) and decompression+fusion($37,674±11,686 vs. $40,825±11,570, p=0.03). QALY gained at 24-months was similar in patients without/with complication for decompression alone(0.68±0.70 vs. 0.72±0.63, p=0.81) and decompression+fusion(0.59±0.60 vs. 0.46±0.60, p=0.21). Cost/QALY gained was reduced in patients without vs. with complication for decompression alone($23,725/QALY vs. $29,614/QALY, p=0.05) and decompression+fusion($63,854/QALY gain vs. $88,750/QALY, p=0.11),Table 2.

    Conclusions: Lumbar surgery provided significant improvement in pain, disability, and quality of life at 24-months regardless of occurrence of complication within 90-days post-operatively. Occurrence of complication resulted in significantly increased cost at 24-months. Cost-utility was $5,889 higher after decompression alone and $24,896 higher after decompression+fusion. Measures focused on prevention of complications will improve value of spine surgery.

    Patient Care: Complications significantly increase the cost of care and reduce overall cost-effectiveness of spinal surgery. Measures focused on prevention of complications will improve value of spine surgery.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) Describe the importance of complications on cost, effectiveness, and cost-utility following lumbar surgery

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy