Skip to main content
  • Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Multimodal Surgical Stabilization of Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis

    Final Number:

    Salman Abbasifard MD; Cameron Miles Johnstone BA; Kamran Sattarov MD; Christina M. Walter MS; Mauricio J. Avila MD; Apar Patel MD MPH; Ali A. Baaj MD

    Study Design:

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves 2016 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Spine fractures of the thoracic and lumbar area are common injuries that can result in significant disability, deformity and neurological deficits. In unstable fractures, controversies exist regarding the surgical approach and outcome of patients after treatment. In this study, we report the clinical and radiographic outcomes of open posterior stabilization, percutaneous posterior stabilization and combined circumferential stabilization of thoracolumbar fractures based on a retrospective data analysis.

    Methods: Forty one consecutive patients with unstable fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine (T1-L5) were included. Average follow-up was 12 months. Patients who underwent surgical treatment with open posterior stabilization, posterior percutaneous stabilization, and combined circumferential fixation were evaluated for perioperative neurological status (ASIA Impairment Scale), spinal deformity, pain, and complications.

    Results: There were no significant differences between the patients’ age, gender, and cause of injury across the three treatment groups. Five out of twelve (42%) of patients with neurological injury at baseline improved one or more ASIA Impairment scale grades following surgery. One patient showed post-surgical neurological deterioration due to epidural hematoma. Surgery was associated with a statistically significant reduction in pain (P < 0.05) and kyphotic angle (P < 0.05). Postoperative complications occurred in three of patients (3 of 41; 7.3%). One early surgical complication was noticed in percutaneous posterior stabilization group due to epidural hematoma. Two late surgical complications were noticed in the open posterior approach group. In one, the patient developed a wound infection and in the other, instrumentation failure occurred.

    Conclusions: Satisfactory neurological and functional outcomes were achieved in majority of patients with spine fractures who underwent different surgical interventions. Within the limitation of a retrospective study and low volume of cases, we found that circumferential instrumentation, open posterior instrumentation, and percutaneous posterior instrumentation effectively stabilized injured spine fracture and treated vertebral deformity without evidence of significant complications.

    Patient Care: In this study, we reported the advantages and disadvantages of open posterior stabilization, percutaneous posterior stabilization and combined circumferential stabilization of thoracolumbar fractures based on a retrospective data analysis. Understanding the clinical and radiological outcomes of the treated patients can help to better treatment decision making, prevent probable post-operative complications, and increase safety of patients.

    Learning Objectives: This retrospective study, will provide a helpful guideline about advantages and limitations of three different surgical treatments for thoracic and lumbar spine traumatic fractures. As long as review of different types of surgical treatment options, we can get familiar with post-operative complications.

    References: 1. Bohlman HH FA, Dejak J. The results of treatment of acute injuries of the upper thoracic spine with paralysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67(3):360-9. 2. Durward QJ SJ, Harrison P. Management of fractures of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine. Neurosurgery. 1981;8(5):555-61. 3. Patrick W. Hitchon JCT, Souheil F. Haddad, Kenneth A. Follett. Management Options inThoracolumbar Burst Fractures. Surg Neurol. 1998;49(6):619 –27. 4. Wood KB LW, Lebl DR, Ploumis A. Management of thoracolumbar spine fractures. Spine J. 2014;14(1):145-64. 5. Schnee CL AL. Selection criteria and outcome of operative approaches for thoracolumbar burst fractures with and without neurological deficit. J Neurosurg. 1997;86(1):48-55. 6. CHARLES L. SCHNEE LVA. Selection criteria and outcome of operative approaches for thoracolumbar burst fractures with and without neurological deficit. J Neurosurg. 1997;86(1):48–55. 7. Esses SI BD, Kostuik JP. Evaluation of surgical treatment for burst fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990;15(7):667-73. 8. Dickman CA YM, Lu HT, Melkerson MN. Surgical treatment alternatives for fixation of unstable fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. A meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994;19(20 Suppl):2266S-73S. 9. Graillon T RP, Blondel B, Adetchessi T, Dufour H, Fuentes S. Circumferential management of unstable thoracolumbar fractures using an anterior expandable cage, as an alternative to an iliac crest graft, combined with a posterior screw fixation: results of a series of 85 patients. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37(1):E10. 10. Scheer JK BJ, Fakurnejad S, Oh T, Dahdaleh NS, Smith ZA Evidence-Based Medicine of Traumatic Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Systematic Review of Operative Management across 20 Years. Global Spine J. 2015;5(1):73-82. 11. Aebi M EC, Kehl T, Thalgott J. Stabilization of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine with the internal spinal skeletal fixation system. Indications, techniques, and first results of treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 12(6):544-51. 12. KW C. A reduction-fixation system for unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992;17(8):879-86. 13. Jacobs RR CM. Surgical management of thoracolumbar spinal injuries. General principles and controversial considerations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;189:22-35. 14. H. D. Been GJB. Comparison of two types of surgery for thoraco-lumbar burst fractures: combined anterior and posterior stabilisation vs. posterior instrumentation only. Acta Neurochir 1999;141(4):349-57. 15. Sasso RC CH, Reuben JD. Posterior fixation of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures using DC plates and pedicle screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991;16(3 Suppl):S134-9. 16. Roy-Camille R SG, Mazel C. Plating of thoracic, thoracolumbar, and lumbar injuries with pedicle screw plates. Orthop Clin North Am. 1986;17(1):147-59. 17. Paul RL MR, Dunn JE, Williams JP. Anterior transthoracic surgical decompression of acute spinal cord injuries. J Neurosurg. 1975;43(3):299-307. 18. Lindsey RW DW. The fixateur interne in the reduction and stabilization of thoracolumbar spine fractures in patients with neurologic deficit. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991;16(3 Suppl):S140-5. 19. Gregory C. Wiggins MJR, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Russ P., Nockels RW, Mark E. Shaffrey, James Wagner,Tord, Alden D. A new technique for the surgical management of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures: a modification of the anterior approach and an outcome comparison to traditional methods. Neurosurg Focus. 1999;15(7):e3. 20. OLUMIDE A. DANISA CIS, JOHN A. JANE, RICHARD WHITEHILL, GWO-JAW WANG, THOMAS A. SZABO,, CAROLYN A. HANSEN MS, MARK E. SHAFFREY, DONALD P. K. CHAN. Surgical approaches for the correction of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures: a retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes. J Neurosurg 1995;83(6):977–83. 21. Gurwitz GS DJ, McNamara MJ, Federspiel CF, Spengler DM. Biomechanical analysis of three surgical approaches for lumbar burst fractures using short-segment instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18(8):977-82. 22. Danisa OA SC, Jane JA, Whitehill R, Wang GJ, Szabo TA, Hansen CA, Shaffrey ME, Chan DP. Surgical approaches for the correction of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures: a retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes. J Neurosurg. 1995;83(6):977-83. 23. Viale GL SC, Francaviglia N, Carta F, Bragazzi R, Bernucci C, Maiello M. Transpedicular decompression and stabilization of burst fractures of the lumbar spine. Surg Neurol. 1993;40(2):104-11. 24. Hao D WW, Duan K, Ma M, Jiang Y, Liu T, He B. Two-Year Follow-up Evaluation of Surgical Treatment for Thoracolumbar Fracture-Dislocation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(21):E1284-90. 25. Oh T SJ, Fakurnejad S, Dahdaleh NS, Smith ZA. Minimally invasive spinal surgery for the treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22(1):42-7. 26. Wild MH GM, Plieschnegger C, Wenda K. Five-year follow-up examination after purely minimally invasive posterior stabilization of thoracolumbar fractures: a comparison of minimally invasive percutaneously and conventionally open treated patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127(5):335-43. 27. Palmisani M GA, Brodano GB, De Iure F, Cappuccio M, Boriani L, Amendola L, Boriani S. Minimally invasive percutaneous fixation in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures. Eur Spine J. 2009;18:71-4. 28. Logroscino CA PL, Tamburrelli FC. Minimally invasive spine stabilisation with long implants. Eur Spine J. 2009;18:75-81. 29. Jiang XZ TW, Liu B, Li Q, Zhang GL, Hu L, Li Z, He D. Comparison of a paraspinal approach with a percutaneous approach in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures with posterior ligamentous complex injury: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Int Med Res. 2012;40(4):1343-56. 30. Hofstetter CP CD, Newman CB, Aryan HE, Girardi FP, Härtl R. Posterior approach for thoracolumbar corpectomies with expandable cage placement and circumferential arthrodesis: a multicenter case series of 67 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14(3):388-97. 31. Schnake KJ SS, Kandziora F. Five-year clinical and radiological results of combined anteroposterior stabilization of thoracolumbar fractures. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;20(5):497-504.

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy