Skip to main content
  • Pipeline Embolization Device Malfunction After Complete Deployment Treated with Microsurgical Extraction

    Final Number:
    276

    Authors:
    Dale Ding MD; Kenneth C. Liu MD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:
    Cerebrovascular

    Meeting: AANS/CNS Cerebrovascular Section 2014 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: The Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment approach for complex intracranial aneurysms. Intraprocedural complications during PED deployment are seldom reported.

    Methods: We report a rare complication of a PED malfunction identified immediately following complete deployment during endovascular treatment of a giant middle cerebral artery (MCA) bifurcation aneurysm.

    Results: After multiple failed attempts at endovascular retrieval of the malfunctioned PED, the patient was taken for microsurgical extraction due to accumulation of thrombus on the proximal unopened portion of the stent and widespread distal dissemination of emboli. After removing the PED from the vessel lumen and resecting the giant aneurysm, the proximal MCA was unable to be reanastamosed to the distal segment.

    Conclusions: The management of PED malfunction is poorly understood. While removal of an incompletely deployed PED may be undertaken with limited adverse effects, retrieval of a fully deployed PED is associated with a much higher risk of morbidity. Until larger case series of such complications are able to better define the risks and benefits of endovascular or microsurgical retrieval of malfunctioned PEDs, the management of these rare intraprocedural complications will remain based on the unique aspects of each individual case and the expertise of the treating neurointerventionalist.

    Patient Care: As the utilization of the Pipeline Embolization Device for intracranial aneurysm treatment becomes increasingly popular, rare but devastating complications, such as malfunction following complete deployment, should be recognized as potential sentinel events. The best management strategy for this event is currently unknown, but we propose microsurgical extraction as a potential, although imperfect, solution.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to 1) Describe the importance of properly managing pipeline stent malfunction, 2) Discuss, in small groups the efficacy of microsurgical pipeline stent extraction, and 3) Identify an effective treatment for malfunctioned pipeline stents unable to be salvaged with endovascular techniques.

    References: 1. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms--risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention. International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1998 Dec 10;339(24):1725-33. 2. Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I, McDougall CG, Szikora I, Lanzino G, et al. Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms: Results from a Multicenter Clinical Trial. Radiology. 2013 Jun;267(3):858-68. 3. Cantore G, Santoro A, Guidetti G, Delfinis CP, Colonnese C, Passacantilli E. Surgical treatment of giant intracranial aneurysms: current viewpoint. Neurosurgery. 2008 Oct;63(4 Suppl 2):279-89; discussion 89-90. 4. Chen M, Goldstein-Smith L. Endovascular rescue of a misshapen intracranial stent: report of two cases. J Neurointerv Surg. 2011 Mar;3(1):25-6. 5. Colby GP, Gomez JF, Lin LM, Paul AR, Coon AL. In situ removal of the pipeline embolization device: the 'corking' and 'pseudo-corking' techniques. J Neurointerv Surg. 2013 Mar;5(2):e6. 6. Fargen KM, Velat GJ, Lawson MF, Mocco J, Hoh BL. Review of reported complications associated with the Pipeline Embolization Device. World Neurosurg. 2012 Mar-Apr;77(3-4):403-4. 7. Fiorella D, Lylyk P, Szikora I, Kelly ME, Albuquerque FC, McDougall CG, et al. Curative cerebrovascular reconstruction with the Pipeline embolization device: the emergence of definitive endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg. 2009 Jul;1(1):56-65. 8. McAuliffe W, Wycoco V, Rice H, Phatouros C, Singh TJ, Wenderoth J. Immediate and midterm results following treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Jan;33(1):164-70. 9. Nelson PK, Lylyk P, Szikora I, Wetzel SG, Wanke I, Fiorella D. The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Jan;32(1):34-40. 10. Oh Y, Hwang DH, Ko YH, Kang IW, Kim IS, Hur CW. Foreign body removal by snare loop: during intracranial stent procedure. Neurointervention. 2012 Feb;7(1):50-3. 11. Parkinson RJ, Eddleman CS, Batjer HH, Bendok BR. Giant intracranial aneurysms: endovascular challenges. Neurosurgery. 2006 Nov;59(5 Suppl 3):S103-12; discussion S3-13. 12. Raftopoulos C, Goffette P, Billa RF, Mathurin P. Transvascular coil hooking procedure to retrieve an unraveled Guglielmi detachable coil: technical note. Neurosurgery. 2002 Apr;50(4):912-4; discussion 4-5. 13. Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J, 3rd, Meissner I, Brown RD, Jr., Piepgras DG, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet. 2003 Jul 12;362(9378):103-10. 14. Yu SC, Kwok CK, Cheng PW, Chan KY, Lau SS, Lui WM, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: midterm outcome of pipeline embolization device--a prospective study in 143 patients with 178 aneurysms. Radiology. 2012 Dec;265(3):893-901.

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy