Skip to main content
  • Impact of Trajectory Planning with Susceptibility Weighted Imaging for Intracranial Electrode Implantation

    Final Number:

    Guilherme Barros M.Sc.; Michael J. Lang MD; Ashwini Dayal Sharan MD; Chengyuan Wu MD, MS

    Study Design:

    Subject Category:
    Image Guided Applications

    Meeting: 2016 ASSFN Biennial Meeting

    Introduction: Recently, susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) has been used along with traditional T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced (T1-Gd) MRI for trajectory planning during deep brain stimulation (DBS) and stereoelectroencephalograpy (SEEG) procedures. This study was performed to determine the effect of SWI versus T1-Gd vessel resolution on hemorrhagic complications during electrode implantation.

    Methods: Fourteen patients undergoing DBS or SEEG electrode placement were implanted with a total of 114 electrodes. All patients underwent 3D CT and MR imaging post-operatively, and all trajectories were planned without use of SWI sequences. Post-operative CT images were co-registered to pre-operatively acquired T1-Gd and SWI sequences. Images were analyzed for presence of electrodes intersecting or passing within 1mm of cerebral vessels on both T1-Gd and SWI sequences.

    Results: No patients had procedure-related intracerebral hemorrhage on post-operative MRI. Sixty unique instances of electrodes intercepting cerebral blood vessels were identified on SWI sequences (rate per electrode 52.6%, and average 4.3 interceptions per patient), of which 34 were superficial and 26 were deep in location. Eighteen interceptions were identified on T1-Gd (rate per electrode 15.8%, and average 1.3 interceptions per patient). There was a statistically significant difference in mean diameter of vessel intercepted, measuring 1.50±0.5mm on SWI, and 2.12±0.7mm on T1-Gd images (p=0.00024). Addition of electrodes passing within 1mm of cerebral vessels resulted in total 104 total instances (“interception plus near-miss”) on SWI (91.2% per electrode, 7.4 per patient) and 23 instances on T1-Gd (20.2% per electrode, 1.6 per patient).

    Conclusions: Susceptibility weighted imaging is likely over-sensitive for electrode trajectory planning. There were no hemorrhages despite the high rate of electrode interception of or close proximity to cerebral vessels on SWI compared to T1-Gd imaging.

    Patient Care: Our research helps neurosurgeons choose the most clinically appropriate imaging study when planning DBS and SEEG procedures in patients with epilepsy and other disorders.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) Understand the importance of differentiating between imaging modalities in intracranial electrode implantation. 2) Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of SWI and T1-Gad in planning DBS and SEEG procedures. 3) Recognize the over-sensitivity of SWI in trajectory planning for electrode implantation.


We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy