In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Delayed Scalp Erosion After DBS Surgery: Incidence, Treatment, Outcomes and Prevention

    Final Number:
    550

    Authors:
    Justin D Hilliard MD; Alberto Bona MD; Michael S. Okun MD; Kelly D. Foote MD

    Study Design:
    Clinical Trial

    Subject Category:
    Movement Disorders

    Meeting: 2018 ASSFN Biennial Meeting

    Introduction: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapeutic modality for movement disorders, however, complications related to the surgical technique and the implanted hardware do occur and must be minimized to optimize outcomes. Delayed erosion of the scalp overlying protruding DBS hardware is one such adverse event that universally requires surgical treatment and often necessitates explantation of the DBS system. In this study, we evaluated the incidence of delayed scalp erosion in a large single center series of DBS patients, and we propose a surgical strategy for avoiding this complication. We have modified our surgical technique to eliminate protrusion of DBS hardware, effectively preventing delayed erosions. This technique consists of drilling a recess around the burr hole to countersink the DBS cap, and drilling a groove in the parietal calvarium to countersink the connector.

    Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 1053 consecutive DBS lead implantations and 867 lead extension cable placements at a single center (UF) by a single surgeon (KDF) from 2002 to 2014. Patients were separated into countersunk and non-countersunk groups based on the surgical technique applied at the time of implantation. We routinely began countersinking the frontal cap in 2011 and the connector in 2013. Each patient had a follow-up time of at least 12 months.

    Results: No frontal scalp erosions developed at sites where the cap had been countersunk versus 11 erosions (1.4%) in the non- countersunk group. One parietal scalp erosion developed at the site where the connector had been countersunk versus 12 erosions (1.5%) in the non-countersunk group.

    Conclusions: There was a statistically significant reduction in erosion of the frontal DBS cap with countersinking technique and a strong trend toward significant reduction in wound erosion of the lead extension connector. We propose that the countersinking technique should become standard of care due to decrease in wound erosions.

    Patient Care: Decreasing wound erosions in DBS patients will diminish the number of patients requiring surgery for wound revision. Wound erosions correlate with wound infection. Decreasing wound erosions will therefore also decrease the infection rate of DBS systems.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) Describe the importance of DBS wound erosions, 2) Explain the value of countersinking

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy