Skip to main content
  • Thirty-day Outcomes after Craniotomy for Metastatic Tumor: The NSQIP Intracranial Metastases Scale

    Final Number:
    1236

    Authors:
    Hormuzdiyar H. Dasenbrock MD, MPH; Timothy R. Smith MD PhD MPH; William B. Gormley MD; Elizabeth Claus MD; Ian F. Dunn MD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2018 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: The goal of this study is to evaluate thirty-day outcomes after craniotomy for metastatic tumor, and to build a predictive scale that may be an adjunct when risk-stratifying patients preoperatively.

    Methods: Patients who underwent craniotomy for an intracranial metastasis were extracted from the prospective National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry (NSQIP, 2011-2013). Multivariable logistic regression evaluated predictors of developing an adverse event (death, a major neurologic or medical complication, reoperation, or nonroutine discharge) within thirty days; predictors screened included patient demographics, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, functional status, comorbidities, preoperative laboratory values, and case urgency. Independent predictors were utilized to build a predictive scale, which was validated using the 2014 NSQIP release.

    Results: Among the 1,853 patients in the study population, the thirty-day mortality rate was 6.2%, a major complication occurred in 15.2% and a nonroutine hospital discharge in 21.6% of patients. The NSQIP intracranial metastasis scale was constructed: one point was assigned for ASA class 3 designation, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, emergent surgery, age 56-65 years, and mild anemia (hematocrit 30-40%); two points for dependent functional status, severe anemia (hematocrit < 30%), and preoperative intubation; and three points for ASA class 4-5 designation and age greater than 65 years. In the validation population, increased score was associated with higher odds of an adverse event (OR=1.31, 95% CI=1.21-1.42, p<0.001, C-statistic=0.63); greater score was also associated with increased odds of thirty-day mortality, any complication, a major medical complication, and nonroutine hospital discharge (all p<0.001, C-statistic=0.60-0.65).

    Conclusions: The NSQIP intracranial metastasis scale identifies preoperative clinical variables that impact the thirty-day postoperative outcomes, and may be an adjunct when risk-stratifying patients preoperatively. Future studies combining these surgical predictors with oncologic variables may augment decision analysis regarding treatment of intracranial metastases.

    Patient Care: This NSQIP analysis identifies predictors of adverse events among patients undergoing craniotomy for intracranial metastases. Additionally, the predictive scale may be used to risk-stratify patients preoperatively, as well as provide a platform for future predictive analytics.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of the session, participants should be able to 1) identify the thirty-day cumulative incidence of mortality, complications, and adverse events after craniotomy for intracranial metastases; 2) describe the predictors of adverse events included in the NSQIP intracranial metastases scale; and 3) discuss the utility and limitations to the use of the scale for preoperative risk-stratification.

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy