In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Comparative Analysis of Decompression Versus Decompression and Fusion for Surgical Management of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

    Final Number:
    1522

    Authors:
    Thomas Pieters MD; Yan Icy Li; James Towner MD; Tyler Schmidt DO; G. Edward Vates MD PhD; Webster H. Pilcher MD, PhD; Yan Michael Li MD PhD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2018 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: When symptomatic lumbar stenosis involves spondylolisthesis, many surgeons consider it an indication to include fixation. However, after multiple studies, including two randomized controlled trials, there is no consensus to definitive treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis.

    Methods: Multicenter, prospectively collected data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database was used to compare 30-day outcomes and complications for decompression alone vs decompression and fusion in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis from 2005-2015. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze the effect of surgical type on multiple outcome variables.

    Results: The ACS NSQIP database included 9606 patients with surgically managed lumbar spondylolisthesis. Of these, 907 were managed with decompression alone, while 8699 had both decompression and fusion. Patients in the fusion cohort tended to be younger (p < 0.001) and smokers (p = 0.01). The percent unplanned return to OR was 3.02% in the fusion group, compared with 1.02% in the decompression-only group (p = 0.011). The percent of minor adverse events was 12.8% in the fusion group vs 4.9% in the decompression group (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day mortality, major adverse events or 30-day readmission.

    Conclusions: The data show a clear bias towards fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis. However, even with this, the 30-day outcome measures of unplanned return to the OR, as well as minor adverse events, were statistically significantly higher for patients undergoing a fusion compared with decompression alone. These findings, combined with similar functional outcomes in recent trials, could influence decision making in the surgical management of lumbar spondylolisthesis. This database study indicates that further long-term investigation is warranted, but that decompression alone may be associated with less morbidity in properly selected patients.

    Patient Care: This research adds to the conversation regarding decision making in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. In patients with higher preoperative risk, this research might influence decision making towards decompression only vs decompression and fusion.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to 1.) identify preoperative factors that are related to decompression alone vs decompression and fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and 2.) identify which post-operative adverse events are correlated with fusion vs decompression alone in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis

    References: Ghogawala, Z. et al. Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:1424-1434. Försth P. et al. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 14;374(15):1413-23.

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy