In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • An Association Between Novel Measures of Muscle Mass at the Cervical Level in Patients with Fragility Fractures of the Cervical Spine

    Final Number:

    Mohammed Ali Alvi MD; Mohamed Elminawy; Yagiz U Yolcu MD; Waseem Wahood MS; Marko Tomov; Ahmad Nassr MD; Arjun Sebastian MD; Mohamad Bydon MD; Brett Arthur Freedman

    Study Design:

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2018 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Sarcopenia or decreased muscle mass has recently been acknowledged as a surrogate for patient frailty, which is a marker of physiologic reserve. The correlation between muscle mass and bone fragility at the cervical spine is unknown.

    Methods: In this retrospective case-control study, patients with CT-scans who underwent cervical fusion for fragility-fractures of the cervical spine composed the test cohort. Controls included healthy young(aged 21-30) patients presenting to the emergency room after minor trauma(Abbreviated injury score < 2) with CT-scans of the cervical spine without evidence of significant cervical spine injury. CT-scans were reviewed by 3 reviewers to make the following measurements:cross-sectional area of sterno-cleido-mastoid muscle(SCM), longus-colli muscles(LCM) bilaterally and vertebral body(VB) on a single axial cut at the C4 mid-pedicle level. We used LCM-VB and SCM-VB ratios as markers of frailty which were divided into quartiles. Agreement between the reviewers was assessed using two-way intra-class correlation coefficient(ICC). Two-sided t-test and multivariable logistic-regression were used to assess the association between morphometric measurements and osteoporotic fracture after adjusting for patient factors.

    Results: Fifty-five cases and 113 controls were eligible for the study. Agreement among reviewers was found to be good for SCM-VB ratios(ICC=0.708,p<0.001) but poor for LCM-VB ratios(ICC=0.02,p=0.409). Mean SCM-VB ratio was significantly lower in cases compared to controls (2.57±0.85 vs 4.14±1.01,MD=1.56,p<0.001). Mean LCM-VB ratio was found to be slightly lower for cases compared to controls (0.998±0.382 vs 1.161±0.464,MD=0.16,p=0.017). On multivariable logistic-regression, patients with low SCM-VB ratio were found to be at significantly higher risk of having a fragility fracture (quartile-1:OR=121.01,95%CI=16.68-877.74,p<0.001; quartile-2:OR=14.73,95%CI=2.66-81.50,p=0.002). We did not find any difference in risk of osteoporotic fracture for LCM-VB ratios.

    Conclusions: Our results indicate that SCM-VB ratio is a reliable measure of relative muscle mass and, similar to bone density, it is markedly diminished in patients who sustain fragility fractures. Sarcopenia may prove important in predicting fragility fracture.

    Patient Care: Fragility fractures are highly important complications for osteoporotic patients. Fractures occurring in spine, especially cervical spine can be life threatening. Presented study aims to understand the risk factors leading to these fractures

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) Describe the importance of muscle mass in development of osteoporotic fractures of the cervical spine. 2) Identify the association between muscle mass-vertebral body volume ratios and risk of osteoporotic fractures.


We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy