In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia Following MVD

    Final Number:
    632

    Authors:
    Suresh Jayabalan MCh[Neuro], FRCS[Neurosurgery]

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2018 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: To evaluate the indication of subsequent operations after first microvascular decompression (MVD) for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia, the intra-operative findings and long-term results of 6 patients outcome are reported.

    Methods: Materials & Methods: In our study we analyzed patients who had persistent trigeminal neuralgia pain following Microvascular decompression on minimum of 10 months post op. Study period was from Febraury 2016 to March 2017. Total of 42 MVDs done during this period. There were 6 MVDs done for recurrence of trigeminal neuralgia. All patients underwent subsequent exploration through the retro-mastoid suboccipital craniotomy. Brain computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess etiology of recurrence. Intra op finding of second operation correlated with CT scan & MRI finding. The mean follow-up period after subsequent operation was 12 months.

    Results: In 4 patients, there were abnormal placement of Teflon patch [PTFE Pledgets] at 7th & 8th nerve complex near root entry zone & significant vascular compression observed at root entry zone of trigeminal nerve. All these patient were operated elsewhere. One patient had persistent venous compression and another patient had venous compression along with Flake of epidermoid material. On 12 months follow up all patient had successful pain relief without any significant complication after second operation.

    Conclusions: There are many etiological factors for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia but abnormally placed position of Teflon patch is a preventable etiology for recurrence. Possible risk factor for abnormally placed Teflon is failure to identify the cranial nerve concerned possibly due to improper angle of microscope or wrong identification of Cranial nerves.

    Patient Care: Identification of Proper Anatomy will reduce the chance of recurrence and further modalities of treatment

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1] realise the importance of basic CPA anatomy, 2] Identification of the Cranial nerves, 3] importance of Need to explore the v cranial nerve fully

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy