In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Analysis of Factors and Conditions Influencing Military Neurosurgery Recruitment

    Final Number:
    1549

    Authors:
    Richard P Menger MD MPA; James Will Robbins MD; Devon LeFever MD; Randy Scott Bell MD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2018 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Neurosurgery remains a critical wartime specialty for the United States military. Here we investigate the objective and subjective factors impacting recruitment and retention of military neurosurgeons.

    Methods: The Council of State Neurosurgical Societies in conjunction with the Joint Military Committee surveyed military neurosurgeons regarding objective and subjective factors related to military service. Military neurosurgeons were directly queried as to whether they would or would not recommend military neurosurgery to a neurosurgery colleague. This question served as a surrogate marker for military neurosurgery recruitment.

    Results: A total of 121 current or previously affiliated military neurosurgeons responded to the question regarding whether they would recommend military neurosurgery to a colleague. 76.9% (93/121) would recommend military service to a fellow neurosurgeon. Of these, the most rewarding factors in their service were: pride and patriotism (93.6%, 87/93), camaraderie (78.5%, 73/83), treating military patients (72.0% 67/93), and focus on clinical care/not the business of medicine (66.7%, 62/93). On multivariate analysis those who felt empowered by their military service with a sense of patriotism were 4.3 times more likely to recommend military service to another neurosurgery (p = 0.027, CI 1.19 - 16.82). Likewise, those who developed a sense of camaraderie within their military service showed a statistical trend to being more likely to recommend military service to their peers (p = 0.058, CI 0.95 - 9.78). Those with a current military obligation were .28 times (p=0.02, CI 0.09-0.85) as likely to recommend service as a military neurosurgeon as compared to those neurosurgeons who are separated or retired. Branch served in and rank obtained was not found to be statistically significant in predicting the likelihood of referring a neurosurgery colleague into military neurosurgery.

    Conclusions: Service in the United States military is a positive experience with camaraderie, patriotism, and unique military experiences being stated as positive and predictive of military neurosurgery recruitment. These factors should be explored and fostered regarding recruitment and ultimately retention of military neurosurgeons. It remains vitally important to continue to have a strong military neurosurgery corps.

    Patient Care: This will help ensure that best quality care for military service members by illustrating the factors needed to increase recruitment to the military neurosurgery ranks.

    Learning Objectives: 1) Understand the importance of military neurosurgery in both academic and clinical care delivery. 2) Understand the need to recruit the best possible individuals into military neurosurgery 3) Understand the factors that aide in recruitment of military neurosurgeons.

    References: Breasted JH. The Edwin Smith Surgical Papyrus . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1930. 2. Clower WT, Finger S. Discovering trepanation: the contribution of Paul Broca. Neurosurgery . 2001;49(6):1417-1426. Google ScholarCrossRefPubMed 3. Dowdy J, Pait TG. The influence of war on the development of neurosurgery. J Neurosurg . 2014;120(1):237-243. Google ScholarCrossRefPubMed 4. Finger S, Clower WT. Victor Horsley on “trephining in pre-historic times.” Neurosurgery . 2001;48(4):911-918. Google ScholarPubMed 5. Moodie RL. Surgery in pre-Columbia Peru. Studies in paleopathology, XXIII. In: Surgery in Pre-Columbia Peru. Studies in Paleopathology, XXIII . New York: Paul B. Hoeber Inc.; 1929:698-728. 6. Homer. The Iliad . Ware: Wordsworth Classics; 1995. 7. Sahlas DJ. Functional neuroanatomy in the pre-Hippocratic era: observations from the Iliad of Homer. Neurosurgery . 2001;48(6):1352-1357. Google ScholarPubMed 8. Lister J. On the antiseptic principle in the practice of surgery. BMJ . 1867;2(351):246-248. Google ScholarCrossRefPubMed 9. Rutkow EI, Rutkow IM. George Crile, Harvey Cushing, and the ambulance américaine: military medical preparedness in World War I. Arch Surg . 2004;139(6):678-685. Google ScholarCrossRefPubMed 10. Carey ME. Major Harvey Cushing's difficulties with the British and American armies during World War I. J Neurosurg . 2014;121(2):319-327. Google ScholarCrossRefPubMed 11. Cushing H. Concerning operations for the cranio-cerebral wounds of modern warfare. Military Surg . 1916;38:601-615. 12. Hanigan WC. Neurological surgery during the Great War: the influence of Colonel Cushing. Neurosurgery . 1988;23(3):283-294. Google ScholarCrossRefPubMed 13. Congressional Budget OfficeGoldberg MS. Updated Death and Injury Rates of U.S. Military Personnel during the Conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan; 2014. Available at: https://www.cbo.gov/publications/49837. Accessed January 24, 2017. 14. Bell RS, Mossop CM, Dirks MS et al. Early decompressive craniectomy for severe penetrating and closed head injury during wartime. Neurosurg Focus . 2010;28(5):E1. Google ScholarCrossRefPubMed 15. Dowdy J, Pait TG. The influence of war on the development of neurosurgery. J Neurosurg . 2014;120(1):237-243. Google ScholarCrossRefPubMed 16. Bell RS, Ecker RD, Severson MA3rd, Wanebo JE, Crandall B, Armonda RA. The evolution of the treatment of traumatic cerebrovascular injury during wartime. Neurosurg Focus . 2010;28(5):E5. Google ScholarCrossRefPubMed 17. Formby PM, Wagner SC, Kang DG, Van Blarcum GS, Lehman RAJr. Operative management of complex lumbosacral dissociations in combat injuries. Spine J . 2016;16(10):1200-1207. Google ScholarCrossRefPubMed 18. Menger RP, Wolf ME, Lang RW3rd et al. Military neurosurgery: a range of service options. Neurosurgery . 2016;78(6):765-774. Google ScholarCrossRefPubMed 19. Moquin RR, Ecklund JM. Socioeconomic issues of United States military neurosurgery. Neurosurg Focus . 2002;12(4):1-6. Google ScholarCrossRef 20. Ragel BT, Klimo PJr, Grant GA et al. Economic analysis of the military health professions scholarship program for neurosurgeons. Neurosurgery . 2011;69(3):525-532. Google ScholarCrossRefPubMed 21. Ragel BT, Taggard DA, Klimo PJr, Liu JM, Robison S, Sholes AH. Increasing the neurosurgical caseload at a military hospital: initial experience with a Joint Military–Veterans Affairs (VA) Sharing Agreement. Military Med . 2009;174(2):103-105. Google ScholarCrossRef 22. MISSION ZERO Act. House Resolution 880; 2017. Available at: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/115/hr880/tex. Accessed May 5, 2017. 23. Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU. Administrative work consumes one-sixth of U.S. physicians' working hours and lowers their career satisfaction. Int J Health Serv . 2014;44(4):635-642. Google ScholarCrossRefPubMed 24. Klimo PJr, Ragel BT. Introduction: military neurosurgery, past and present. Neurosurg Focus . 2010;28(5). 25. Ragel BT, Klimo PJr, Martin JE, Teff RJ, Bakken HE, Armonda RA. Wartime decompressive craniectomy: technique and lessons learned. Neurosurg Focus . 2010;28(5):E2.

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy