Skip to main content
  • Management of Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries Simplified: Experience with an Aspirin-Based Approach

    Final Number:
    339

    Authors:
    Joshua Catapano MD; sharjeel israr; Andrew F. Ducruet MD; Felipe Albuquerque MD; Alex Whiting MD; Nathan Rubalcava MD; Laura A. Snyder MD; Jordan Weinberg MD; Joseph M. Zabramski MD, FAANS, FACS

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2018 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Although the optimal antithrombotic therapy for extracranial blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) remains unknown, anticoagulation with intravenous heparin has been favored. In the current decade, however, we transitioned our practice to an aspirin-based approach. The purpose of this study was to review the efficacy and bleeding risk of this strategy for BCVI management.

    Methods: Patients with BCVI were identified at a Level-1 trauma center between 2010-2017. Imaging was reviewed and electronic medical records were examined for patient information including demographics, injury type, therapy, complications, outcomes, and follow-up.

    Results: Over the study period, 13,578 patients were admitted following blunt trauma with 94 (0.7%) patients having confirmed BCVI. Average age was 42 years, with 68 males (72%). Mean Injury Severity Score and Glasgow Coma Score were 27 and 10, respectively. 130 vessels were found to have been injured, with a predominance of vertebral artery injuries (78, 60%). The majority of vessels sustained Biffl Grade I or II injury (53 (38%) and 38 (29%) respectively). 26 (28%) patients died during hospitalization. Twelve (13%) patients suffered an ischemic event; 3 following initial diagnosis. Aspirin was primary treatment for 56 (59.6%) patients, 30 (32%) patients received no treatment, and 7 (7.4%) underwent endovascular therapy. 4 (7%) patients treated with aspirin suffered a bleeding complication (2 with progression of intracranial hemorrhage and 2 with GI bleed). Of the 68 survivors, 33(48.5%) patients had follow-up imaging with a mean follow-up of 36 days and 2(6%) patients had progression of injury. Fifteen (46%) patients had improvement.

    Conclusions: An aspirin-based management strategy for BCVI was observed to be both efficacious and relatively safe. The incidence of ischemic events was lower than the majority of previous reports, as was the risk of bleeding. An aspirin-based approach is both simple and effective, and may be the preferred antithrombotic treatment for BCVI.

    Patient Care: Our institution has been using an aspirin based management for patients with BCVIs and aggressive endovascular therapy for these patients when indicated. Our cohort had lower incidence of stroke than the majority of other studies. We hope by adapting and evolving our strategy we can lower the risk of stroke and morbidity in these patients.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) Describe the low bleeding and stroke risk of an aspirin based approach for the treatment of BCVI, 2) Discuss in small groups and compare an aspirin based BCVI treatment approach vs a heparin approached treatment, 3)Identify an effective treatment plan for patients with BCVIs.

    References: 1. Bruns BR, Tesoriero R, Kufera J, et al. Blunt cerebrovascular injury screening guidelines. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(3):691-695. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab1b4d. 2. Bromberg WJ, Collier BC, Diebel LN, et al. Blunt cerebrovascular injury practice management guidelines: the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma. 2010;68(2):471-477. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181cb43da. 3. Biffl WL, Moore EE, Ryu RK, et al. The Unrecognized Epidemic of Blunt Carotid Arterial Injuries. Ann Surg. 1998;228(4):462-470. doi:10.1097/00000658-199810000-00003. 4. Mutze S, Rademacher G, Matthes G, Hosten N, Stengel D. Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury in Patients with Blunt Multiple Trauma: Diagnostic Accuracy of Duplex Doppler US and Early CT Angiography. Radiology. 2005;237(3):884-892. doi:10.1148/radiol.2373042189. 5. Cothren CC. Anticoagulation Is the Gold Standard Therapy for Blunt Carotid Injuries to Reduce Stroke Rate. Arch Surg. 2004;139(5):540. doi:10.1001/archsurg.139.5.540. 6. Biffl WL, Ray CE, Moore EE, et al. Treatment-Related Outcomes From Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries. Ann Surg. 2002;235(5):699-707. doi:10.1097/00000658-200205000-00012. 7. Stein DM, Boswell S, Sliker CW, Lui FY, Scalea TM. Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries: Does Treatment Always Matter? J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2009;66(1):132-144. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e318142d146. 8. Davis JW, Holbrook TL, Hoyt DB, Mackersie RC, Field TO, Shackford SR. Blunt carotid artery dissection: incidence, associated injuries, screening, and treatment. J Trauma. 1990;30(12):1514-1517. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2258964. 9. Griessenauer CJ, Fleming JB, Richards BF, et al. Timing and mechanism of ischemic stroke due to extracranial blunt traumatic cerebrovascular injury. J Neurosurg. 2013;118(2):397-404. doi:10.3171/2012.11.JNS121038. 10. Redekop GJ. Extracranial carotid and vertebral artery dissection: a review. Can J Neurol Sci. 2008;35:146-152. doi:10.1017/S0317167100008556.

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy