Skip to main content
  • Elderly Patients Have Worse EQ-5D Outcomes After Spondylolisthesis Surgery Than Young Patients, Yet They Are Satisfied With Surgery

    Final Number:
    586

    Authors:
    Andrew Chan; Erica Bisson; Mohamad Bydon; Steven Glassman; Kevin Foley; Eric Potts; Christopher Shaffrey; Mark Shaffrey; Domagoj Coric; Michael Wang; John Knightly; Paul Park; Kai-Ming Fu; Jonathan Slotkin; Anthony Asher; Michael Virk; Panagiotis Kerezoudis; Silky Chotai; Anthony M. DiGiorgio; Catherine Miller; Regis Haid; Praveen Mummaneni

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2018 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: A recent randomized clinical trial assessing outcomes following surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis excluded patients who were older than 80 years. This study assesses outcomes for patients age>80 years following surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

    Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospective registry. 808 patients underwent surgery for grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis at twelve high-enrolling sites. Elderly patients were identified as age>80 years. Baseline and surgical variables were collected. Numeric rating scale (NRS) back pain, NRS leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D), and the North American Spine Society (NASS) Satisfaction Questionnaire were collected at baseline and 12 months.

    Results: Thirty six (4.5%) patients were elderly (range 80-95 years). Elderly patients had lower mean BMI (28.1±4.9 vs. 30.7±6.4, p=0.01), had a higher proportion of osteoporosis (16.7 vs. 6.5%, p=0.04) and were less independently ambulatory at baseline (75.0 vs. 88.0%, p=0.04). Elderly patients received fewer fusion procedures (41.7 vs. 75.8%, p<0.001). There was no difference in satisfaction (elderly 83.3 vs. 83.7% NASS 1/2; p=0.85) and reoperation rate (elderly 8.3 vs. 4.9%, p=0.60) at 12 months. At baseline, the elderly cohort had less NRS back pain (5.6±3.1 vs. 6.9±2.6, p=0.02) and higher EQ-5D (0.62±0.19 vs. 0.54±0.24, p=0.04). At 12 months, both the elderly and the control cohort improved significantly with respect to mean baseline values for NRS back and leg pain, ODI, and EQ-5D (p<0.01 for all comparisons). In multivariate analysis, elderly status predicted inferior 12-month EQ5D change scores (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86-0.99, p=0.03) but was not predictive of NRS back and leg pain, and ODI change scores (all p>0.05).

    Conclusions: In adjusted analysis, age>80 years was associated with inferior improvements in EQ-5D at 12 months following lumbar spondylolisthesis surgery. However, the elderly had similar satisfaction, pain, and disability as the younger patients.

    Patient Care: Outcomes for the elderly are poorly defined following surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. This study provides prospective evidence that the elderly (age > 80 years) had similar satisfaction, pain, and disability as younger patients despite inferior improvement in EQ-5D.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) Describe the outcomes for patients greater than 80 years of age undergoing lumbar spondylolisthesis surgery (patients who were excluded in a recent large randomized clinical trial) 2) Understand that elderly patients had similar outcomes for satisfaction, pain, and disability 12 months following surgery despite inferior improvement in EQ-5D

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy