In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Occlusion Rates of Single versus Double Pipeline Embolization Constructs for Flow Diversion of True Ophthalmic Segment ICA Aneurysms: A Single-Institution Series of 124 Consecutive Cases

    Final Number:
    518

    Authors:
    Matt Bender BA; Bowen Jiang MD; Erick Michael Westbroek BS, MD; Risheng Xu AB AM MD PhD; Jessica K. Campos MD; Li-Mei Lin MD; Geoffrey P. Colby MD, PhD; Arun Chandra BS; Rafael Jesus Tamargo MD; Judy Huang MD; Alexander L. Coon MD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2018 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: True ophthalmic segment internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms, due to branch vessel inclusion within the aneurysm fundus, have been observed to have higher rates of persistence after flow diversion. There are limited reports on the relationship between number of Pipeline embolization devices (PED) and long term angiographic occlusion.

    Methods: A prospectively collected, IRB-approved database was analyzed for all patients with true ophthalmic artery aneurysms treated by PED without adjunctive coiling at our institution. Occlusion status was assessed based on the O’Kelley-Marotta (OKM) scale for flow diversion.

    Results: A total of 124 consecutive cases were selected for analysis. 88 cases received a single PED and 36 cases received two PEDs. The two groups were evenly matched in aneurysm size (5.85mm vs. 5.41mm) and patient demographics. Five patients in the double PED group had previously been treated with single PED and were re-treated for persistent aneurysm filling. Angiographic follow-up was available in 83% of the cases in both groups, at an average of 15.5 months in the single PED group and 13.9 months in the double PED group. 56.8% (50/88) of single PED-covered ophthalmic aneurysms were completely occluded at last follow-up compared to 76.7% (23/36) in the double PED group. Conversely, 8 cases (9.1%) in the single PED group had persistent aneurysm filling compared to just 1 case (3.3%) in the double PED group (p=0.21). Despite the material risks associated with multiple PEDs, there was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of length of stay (2.1 days vs 1.5 days, single vs double), mortality (1% vs 0%, single vs double), transient deficit (4.5% vs 5.6%, single vs double), stroke (0%), intracranial hemorrhage (0%), cranial nerve palsy (0%) or iatrogenic dissection (0%).

    Conclusions: In this large series of single versus double PED for true ophthalmic ICA aneurysms, double coverage resulted in higher angiographic occlusion rates and lower rates of aneurysm persistence, without jeopardizing overall patient clinical outcomes.

    Patient Care: True ophthalmic segment internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms, due to branch vessel inclusion within the aneurysm fundus, have been observed to have higher rates of persistence after flow diversion. There are limited reports on the relationship between number of Pipeline embolization devices (PED) and long term angiographic occlusion. This study explores a large institutional experience on single-stage single versus double PED for coverage of these aneurysms. The research will impact clinical decision making about how to approach flow diversion of these aneurysms.

    Learning Objectives: To explore the outcomes of single-stage single versus double Pipeline embolization devices for treatment of true ophthalmic segment ICA aneurysms

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy