Skip to main content
  • Between-hospital Variation in Mortality and Survival after Glioblastoma Surgery

    Final Number:

    Philip C. De Witt Hamer MD PhD; Vincent Ho; Koos Zwinderman; Linda Ackermans MD, PhD; Hilko Ardon MD; Sytske Boomstra; Wim Bouwknegt; Wimar Van den Brink; Clemens M.F. Dirven MD; Niels van der Gaag; Olivier van der Veer; Bas Idema; Alfred Kloet; Jan Koopmans; Mark ter Laan; Marco Verstegen; Michiel Wagemakers; Pierre Alain Robe MD

    Study Design:

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2018 Annual Meeting - Late Breaking Science

    Introduction: To measure between-hospital variation in risk-standardized survival outcome after glioblastoma surgery and to explore the association between survival and hospital characteristics in conjunction with patient-related risk factors.

    Methods: Data of 2,409 adults with first-time glioblastoma surgery at 14 hospitals were obtained from a comprehensive, prospective population-based Quality Registry for Neurological Surgery in the Netherlands between 2011 and 2014. We compared the observed survival with patient-specific risk-standardized expected early (30-day) mortality and expected late (2-year) survival, based on patient age, performance status, and year of treatment. Summarized outcomes per hospital were analyzed in funnel plots. Hospital characteristics were analyzed in logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models.

    Results: Overall 30-day mortality was 5.2% and overall 2-year survival was 13.5%. Median overall survival varied between 4.8 and 14.9 months among hospitals, and biopsy percentages ranged between 16% and 73%. One hospital had lower than expected early mortality, and four hospitals had lower than expected late survival. Higher hospital volume was related with lower early mortality (P=0.031). A 10% increase in volume was associated with 3.9% relative decrease in early mortality, but not with overall survival. Patient-related risk factors (lower age; better performance; more recent years of treatment) were significantly associated with longer overall survival. Of the hospital characteristics, longer overall survival was associated with lower biopsy percentage (HR: 2.09, 1.34-3.26, P=0.001), and not with academic setting (HR: 0.951, 0.858-1.05), nor with hospital volume (HR: 0.954, 0.866-1.05).

    Conclusions: Hospitals vary more in late survival than early mortality after glioblastoma surgery. Widely varying biopsy percentages indicate treatment variation. Patient-related factors have a stronger association with overall survival than hospital-related factors.

    Patient Care: Our research provides - a predictive model based on patient characteristics: - stimulates exploration and improvement of hospital-related determinants of glioblastoma survival in other communities - objective arguments for centralization of oncological care discussions

    Learning Objectives: - to utilize quality registry data at population level - to understand patient-related and hospital-related determinants of glioblastoma survival - to apply community outcome results to patient care


We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy