Skip to main content
  • Lumbar Spine Surgical Site Infection Prevention with a Systematized Peri-operative Protocol: A Propensity Matched Multidepartmental Multiyear Retrospective Cohort Study

    Final Number:
    1138

    Authors:
    Vijay Yanamadala MD; Bryan D. Choi MD; Jean-Valery Coumans MD; Lawrence F. Borges MD; John H. Shin MD

    Study Design:
    Clinical Trial

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2017 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Surgical site infection (SSI) occurs after approximately 4% of degenerative lumbar spine cases and higher for complex spine surgery, including surgery for adult spinal deformity. It remains imperative to develop methods to reduce the incidence of SSI

    Methods: After institutional review board approval, we retrospectively examined 1,089 consecutive lumbar spine surgeries performed between August 1, 2014 and August 1, 2016. Surgeons elected whether or not to use a peri-operative infection control protocol which included: (1) three days of chlorhexidine rinse prior to surgery; (2) chlorhexidine pre-prep scrub of the surgical site; (3) chlorhexidine prep with a 5-minute mandatory wait time; (4) intrawound vancomycin powder; and (5) iodine-impregnated antimicrobial film bandage. Nearest-neighbor propensity matching was performed according to demographic (age, sex, body mass index, co-morbidities, ASA grade, active smoking status) and surgical (operative time, estimated blood loss, number of levels fused) parameters. Statistical significance was p<.05 with a two-tailed ttest.

    Results: 592 patients underwent surgery with this protocol, while 443 patients underwent only chlorhexidine prep. 446 patients (257 with protocol; 189 without) underwent lumbar decompressions. 589 patients (448 with protocol; 141 without) underwent lumbar fusion, with 54 patients (36 with protocol; 18 without) undergoing lumbar fusion involving six or more levels. Overall SSI rate was 1.1% (0.3%, decompression; 1.6%, fusion; 3.2%, fusion = six levels). SSI rate with the protocol was 0.9% (0.3%, decompression; 1.1%, fusion; 2.1%, fusion = six levels) compared to 1.3% without the protocol (0.3%, decompression; 1.9%, fusion; 4.1%, fusion = six levels). Multivariate regression analysis after propensity matching revealed a statistically significant difference in SSI rates for patients undergoing fusion involving six or more levels (p<.05), with a trend towards significance for all lumbar fusions.

    Conclusions: A rigorous SSI prevention protocol can reduce infection rates, particularly in complex cases. Multi-institutional assessment will be essential to further corroborate its efficacy.

    Patient Care: This research will help reduce the incidence of surgical site infection after lumbar spine surgery.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to 1) Describe the risk factors for surgical site infection after lumbar spine surgery; 2) Discuss preventative strategies to reduce the risk of infection; and 3) Identify strategies for the implementation of an infection control and prevention protocol at their own institutions

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy