In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Analysis of 3,298 Consecutive Neurosurgical Cases Demonstrates that Overlapping Surgery has no Adverse Effect on Patient Outcome

    Final Number:
    345

    Authors:
    Brian M Howard MD; Christopher Michael Holland MD, PhD; David Painton Bray MD; Jason J. Lamanna BS; James G Malcolm; Daniel Louis Barrow MD; Jonathan Andrew Grossberg MD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2017 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Overlapping surgery is commonly practiced. However, a dearth of evidence exists to support or refute the safety of overlapping surgery. We endeavored to determine whether overlapping surgery is associated worsened morbidity and mortality in a large series of complex, neurosurgical cases.

    Methods: A retrospective cohort study was completed for all patients who underwent neurosurgical procedures at Emory University Hospital between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2015. Logistic regression models were executed to compare outcomes for overlapping and nonoverlapping surgery. Investigators were blinded to study cohorts during data collection and analysis. Patients were operated on for pathologies across the spectrum of neurosurgical disorders in 3298 included cases. The primary outcome measures were 90-day postoperative mortality and morbidity.

    Results: Of 3298 operations, 1518 (46%) were nonoverlapping while 1780 (54%) were overlapping. The mean age was similar across study groups. The majority of the cohort was female (54% vs. 46%). Patients who underwent overlapping surgery were more likely to be female (56% vs 44%, p=0.002). The distribution of American Association of Anesthesiologists Score was similar between overlapping and nonoverlapping surgery cohorts. Median (IQR) surgical times, in-room and skin-to-skin, were significantly longer for overlapping surgery (203[153.8] vs 173[148.3]; p<0.001 and 125[130] vs 98[120]; p=0.002) than nonoverlapping surgery. Overlapping surgery was more frequently elective (91.3% vs 84.3%; p<0.001). Regression analysis failed to demonstrate a correlation between overlapping surgery and complications such as mortality, any or severe morbidity or unplanned readmission. Measures of baseline severity of illness, such as ASA>3 and emergent surgery, or complexity of surgery, such as the presence of a co-surgeon associated with mortality, overall and severe morbidity, unfavorable discharge location and functional status, both at discharge and follow-up (OdR>1, CI>1 for all).

    Conclusions: These data indicated that overlapping surgery can be safely performed if appropriate safety precautions and patient selection are followed.

    Patient Care: Data such as these will help determine healthcare policy to maximize patient safety, but also make highly specialized surgical care available to as many patients as possible.

    Learning Objectives: Understand factors associated with outcome measures related to overlapping surgery.

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy