Skip to main content
  • Adjacent Segment Level Disease in Klippel-Feil Syndrome Patients with Congenital Cervical Fusion in the Setting of Anterolisthesis: Should Management be Altered in the Presence of Anterolisthesis?

    Final Number:
    1309

    Authors:
    Fernando Enrique Alonso MD; Joe Iwanaga; Christian Fisahn MD; Koichi Watanabe; Elias Rizk; Joshua Chern; Rod J. Oskouian MD; R Shane Tubbs; W. Jerry Oakes

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2017 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: The goal of our study was to determine the incidence of adjacent segment level pathology preoperatively in patients with Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS) and compare it to the incidence in patients who have undergone anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Secondarily, we hypothesized that patients with KFS and anterolisthesis would be more likely to develop symptomatic and radiological adjacent segment level disease.

    Methods: Twenty patients with Klippel-Feil syndrome from a single institution were followed for 33 months; range 4e108 months. Serial imaging and follow-up (serial visits) were used to determine adjacent segment level disease. Patients were separated in two categories: those with anterolisthesis adjacent to their congenitally fused segments and those without.

    Results: Twenty patients with an average age of 9.5 yrs were identified. The average follow-up period was 33 months; range 4e108 months. Nineteen patients received a diagnosis of KFS during incidental imaging. One patient was diagnosed as part of a workup for myelopathy caused by a disc herniation adjacent to two fused segments. Eight patients had no listhesis in cervical levels adjacent to fused vertebral segments while 12 had listhesis. The two most common levels of listhesis were at C3eC4 and C4eC5 (five patients each). Five patients in the listhesis group had an increase in listhesis through the follow-up period. There were no differences in the development of symptoms between patients who had and did not have listhesis. All non-operative patients were asymptomatic at last follow-up.

    Conclusions: Our follow-up was limited, but this study does not support the assumption that a congenitally fused segment predisposes a patient to a rate of adjacent segment level disease similar to patient who has undergone an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. We found no increased risk of symptomatic adjacent segment level disease in KFS patients who had anterolisthesis adjacent to a congenitally fused segment.

    Patient Care: It will help clinicians understand that predisposed notions of adjacent segment level disease in the degenerative spine should not be applied to patients with KFS, therefore decreasing unnecessary surgical intervention in patients with KFS.

    Learning Objectives: The incidence of adjacent segment level pathology preoperatively in patients with Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS) differs from patients who have undergone surgical fusion in the cervical spine

    References: References: 1. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Apr;81(4):519-28. 2. Lee JC, Lee SH, Peters C, Riew KD. Adjacent segment pathology requiring reoperation after anterior cervical arthrodesis: the influence of smoking, sex, and number of operated levels. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 May 15;40(10):E571-7. 3. Klippel M, FeilA. Uncasd’absence des vertèbrescervicales, cage thoraciqueremon- tantjusqu’à la base du crâne. Nouvelle Icon- ographie de la Salpêtrière. 1912. 25:223–250. 4. Saker E, Loukas M, Oskouian RJ, Tubbs RS. The intriguing history of vertebral fusion anomalies: the Klippel-Feil syndrome. DOI 10.1007/s00381-016-3173-4. 5. Samartzis DD, Herman J, Lubicky JP, Shen FH. Classification of congenitally fused cervical patterns in Klippel-Feil patients: epidemiology and role in the development of cervical spine-related symptoms. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:E798–804. 6. Samartzis D, Kalluri P, Herman J, Lubicky JP, Shen FH. Young Investigator Award: The role of congenitally fused cervical segments upon the space available for the cord and associated symptoms in Klippel-Feil patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jun 1;33(13):1442-50. 7. Lee MJ, Dettori JR, Standaert CJ, Ely CG, Chapman JR. Indication for spinal fusion and the risk of adjacent segment pathology: does reason for fusion affect risk? A systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Oct 15;37(22 Suppl):S40-51. 8. Samartzis D, Kalluri P, Herman J, Lubicky JP, Shen FH. Cervical scoliosis in the Klippel-Feil patient. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36(23):E1501–E1508. 9. Thomsen MN, Schneider U,Weber M, Johannisson R, Niethard FU. Scoliosis and congenital anomalies associated with Klippel-Feil syndrome types I–III. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997;22(4):396–401. 10. Cattell HS, Filtzer DL. Pseudosubluxation and other normal variations in the cervical spine in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1965; 47:1295–1309. 11. Kim HJ. Cervical spine anomalies in children and adolescents. CurrOpinPediatr. 2013 Feb;25(1):72-7. 12. Eubanks JD, Belding J, Schnaser E, Rowan A, Moffitt G, Weaver J, Reich MS, Bechtel C, Xie K, Gande A, Hohl J, Braly B, Hilibrand A, Kang JD. Congenital stenosis and adjacent segment disease in the cervical spine. Orthopedics. 2013 Oct 1;36(10):e1251-5. 13. Samartzis D, Kalluri P, Herman J, Lubicky JP, Shen FH. "Clinical triad" findings in pediatric Klippel-Feil patients. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2016 Jun 27;11:15. 14. Kaplan KM, Spivak JM, Bendo JA: Embryology of the spine and associated congenital abnormalities. Spine J 5:564-576, 2005. 15. Samartzis D, Shen FH, Herman J, Mardjetko SM. Atlantoaxial rotatory fixation in the setting of associated congenital malformations: a modified classification system. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Feb 15;35(4):E119-27. 16. Baba H, Maezawa Y, Furusawa N, Chen Q, Imura S, Tomita K. The cervical spine in the Klippel-Feil syndrome– a report of 57 cases. Int Orthop 1995, 19:204–208. 17. Samartzis D, Kalluri P, Herman J, Lubicky JP, Shen FH. The extent of fusion within the congenital Klippel-Feil segment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jul 1;33(15):1637-42. 18. Xue X, Shen J, Zhang J, Tian Y, Zhao H, Wang Y, Liang J, Li Z, Qiu G. Klippel-Feil syndrome in congenital scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Nov 1;39(23):E1353-8. 19. Nouri A, Tetreault L, Zamorano JJ, Mohanty CB, Fehlings MG. Prevalence of Klippel-Feil Syndrome in a Surgical Series of Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Analysis of the Prospective, Multicenter AO Spine North America Study. Global Spine J. 2015 Aug;5(4):294-9. 20. Auerbach JD, Hosalkar HS, Kusuma SK, Wills BP, Dormans JP, Drummond DS. Spinal cord dimensions in children with Klippel-Feil syndrome: a controlled, blinded radiographic analysis with implications for neurologic outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 20;33(12):1366-71. 21. Cho W, Lee DH, Auerbach JD, Sehn JK, Nabb CE, Riew KD. Cervical spinal cord dimensions and clinical outcomes in adults with klippel-feil syndrome: a comparison with matched controls. Global Spine J. 2014 Dec;4(4):217-22.

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy