Skip to main content
  • Surgical Clipping or Endovascular Coiling for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial

    Final Number:
    1000

    Authors:
    Tim Darsaut; Jay Findlay; Elsa Magro; Marc Kotowski; Daniel Roy; Alain Weill; Michel Bojanowski; Chiraz Chaalala; Dana Iancu; Howard Lesiuk; John Sinclair; Felix Scholtes; Didier Martin; Michael Chow; Cian O'Kelly; John Wong; Ken Butcher; Allan Fox; Adam Arthur; Francois Guilbert; Lu Tian; Miguel Chagnon; Suzanne Nolet; Guylaine Gevry; Jean Raymond

    Study Design:
    Clinical Trial

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2017 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) are increasingly diagnosed and are commonly treated using endovascular treatment or microsurgical clipping. The safety and efficacy of treatments have not been compared in a randomized trial. How to treat patients with UIAs suitable for both options remains unknown.

    Methods: We randomly allocated clipping or coiling to patients with one or more 3-25mm UIAs judged treatable both ways. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as: initial failure of aneurysm treatment, intracranial hemorrhage or residual aneurysm on one year imaging. Secondary outcomes included neurological deficits following treatment, hospitalization >5 days, overall morbidity and mortality and angiographic results at one year.

    Results: The trial was designed to include 260 patients. An analysis was performed for slow accrual: 136 patients were enrolled from 2010 through 2016 and 134 patients were treated. The one-year primary outcome, available for 104 patients, was reached in 5/48 (10.4% (4.5%-22.2%)) patients allocated surgical clipping, and 10/56 (17.9% (10.0%-29.8%)) patients allocated endovascular coiling (OR: 0.54 (0.13, 1.90), P=0.40). Morbidity and mortality (mRS>2) at one year occurred in 2/48 (4.2% (1.2%-14.0%)) and 2/56 (3.6% (1.0%-12.1%)) patients allocated clipping and coiling respectively. New neurological deficits (15/65 vs 6/69; OR: 3.12 (1.05, 10.57), P=0.031), and hospitalizations beyond 5 days (30/65 vs 6/69; OR: 8.85 (3.22, 28.59), P=0.0001) were more frequent after clipping.

    Conclusions: Surgical clipping led to greater transient initial treatment-related morbidity than endovascular coiling. Trial continuation and additional randomized evidence will be necessary to establish the supposed superior efficacy of clipping at one year.

    Patient Care: RCTs are widely recognized as the best source of data to inform clinical decision-making

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants will recognize that RCTs are ongoing in the field of cerebrovascular surgery and that more participation is needed

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy