In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Rates and Predictors of Success in Repeat Epilepsy Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

    Final Number:
    1229

    Authors:
    Max Ostrinsky Krucoff MD; Alvin Y Chan BS; Stephen C Harward MD; John David Rolston MD, PhD; Dario J. Englot MD, PhD

    Study Design:
    Laboratory Investigation

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2017 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Medically-refractory epilepsy is a challenging disorder to treat, especially in patients who have failed resection. Current evidence regarding outcomes of repeat epilepsy surgery is limited to small case series, often with conflicting results. Therefore, our group performed a quantitative meta-analysis on available data from the past 30 years to assess for rates and predictors of success.

    Methods: A PubMed search was conducted for studies reporting outcomes of repeat epilepsy surgeries from 1986-2016. Studies were excluded if they contained fewer than 5 patients, had median follow up < 1 year, or did not report disaggregated outcomes. Patients who underwent non-resective interventions were excluded. Outcomes were dichotomized into freedom from disabling seizures vs. persistent seizures, and then stratified by each variable. Variables of interest were evaluated with formal meta-analysis using a random effects model.

    Results: 509 patients who received repeat epilepsy surgery from 20 studies were included. Freedom from disabling seizures (Engel I outcome) was observed in 47.5% of patients after repeat surgery. Significant predictors of seizure freedom in these patients included lesional over nonlesional epilepsy (odds ratio [OR] 1.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45-2.43), temporal lobe over extratemporal/multilobe resection (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.21-2.30), abnormal over normal pre-operative MRI (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.26-2.21), congruent over non-congruent EEG data (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.1), and surgical over disease-related factors as the reason for initial resection failure (OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.1-9.6).

    Conclusions: Here we provide the first quantitative meta-analysis of predictors of success in repeat epilepsy surgery. Predictors of favorable outcome in repeat surgery resemble those reported with initial epilepsy surgery. Overall, nearly half of patients undergoing repeat surgery achieved seizure freedom, suggesting further resection should be considered in patients who fail initial surgery and meet other positive criteria.

    Patient Care: Here we provide the first quantitative evidence of rates and predictors of success in repeat epilepsy surgery across all the data in the current literature. Our work reveals that nearly half of patients who undergo repeat surgery achieve seizure freedom, suggesting further resection should be considered in patients who fail an initial intervention. Furthermore, we have identified factors that predict seizure freedom in this patient population, enabling clinicians to be better informed about their surgical case choices and prognosis for success.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) Describe what a good case for repeat epilepsy surgery might look like 2) Discuss which elements of a case predict successful repeat epilepsy surgery, and supporting evidence 3) Identify which elements of a case are not predictive of successful repeat surgery 4) Discuss the significance and meaning of elements that predict successful repeat surgery

    References: Abosch, A. A., Bernasconi, N. N., Boling, W. W., Jones-Gotman, M. M., Poulin, N. N., Dubeau, F. F., et al. (2002). Factors predictive of suboptimal seizure control following selective amygdalohippocampectomy. J. Neurosurg. 97, 1142–1151. doi:10.3171/jns.2002.97.5.1142. Awad, I. A., Nayel, M. H., Ch., M. B. B., and Luders, H. (1991). Second Operation after the Failure of Previous Resection for Epilepsy. Neurosurgery 28, 510–18. Barba, C., Rheims, S., Minotti, L., Gu??not, M., Hoffmann, D., Chabard??s, S., et al. (2016). Temporal plus epilepsy is a major determinant of temporal lobe surgery failures. Brain 139, 444–451. doi:10.1093/brain/awv372. Bien, C. G., Urbach, H., Schramm, J., Soeder, B. M., Becker, A. J., Voltz, R., et al. (2007). Limbic encephalitis as a precipitating event in adult-onset temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology 69, 1236–1244. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000276946.08412.ef. Bower, R. S., Wirrell, E. C., Eckel, L. J., Wong-Kisiel, L. C., Nickels, K. C., and Wetjen, N. M. (2015). Repeat resective surgery in complex pediatric refractory epilepsy: lessons learned. J. Neurosurg. Pediatr. 16, 94–100. doi:10.3171/2014.12.PEDS14150. Chassoux, F., Laurent, A., and Landré, E. (2017). F-FDG-PET patterns of surgical success and failure in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology 16, 1–10. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000003714. Colosimo, E., Gambardella, A., Mantegazza, M., Labate, A., Rusconi, R., Schiavon, E., et al. (2007). Electroclinical features of a family with simple febrile seizures and temporal lobe epilepsy associated with SCN1A loss-of-function mutation. Epilepsia 48, 1691–1696. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01153.x. Fisher, R., Salanova, V., Witt, T., Worth, R., Henry, T., Gross, R., et al. (2010). Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of thalamus for treatment of refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia 51, 899–908. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02536.x. Germano, I. M., Poulin, N., Ed, M., and Olivier, A. (1994). Reoperation for Recurrent Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. J. Neurosurg. 81, 31–36. González-Martínez, J. A., Srikijvilaikul, T., Nair, D., and Bingaman, W. E. (2007). Long-term seizure outcome in reoperation after failure of epilepsy surgery. Neurosurgery 60, 873–879. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000255438.13871.FA. Goodman, R. R. (2011). AES 2009 Annual Course: Reoperation for medically refractory epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 20, 241–246. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.12.025. Grote, A., Witt, J. A., Surges, R., von Lehe, M., Pieper, M., Elger, C. E., et al. (2016). A second chance-reoperation in patients with failed surgery for intractable epilepsy: long-term outcome, neuropsychology and complications. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 87, 379–385. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2015-310322. Harroud, A., Bouthillier, A., Weil, A. G., and Nguyen, D. K. (2012). Temporal lobe epilepsy surgery failures: a review. Epilepsy Res. Treat. 2012, 201651. doi:10.1155/2012/201651. Hennessy, M. J., Elwes, R. D., Binnie, C. D., and Polkey, C. E. (2000). Failed surgery for epilepsy. A study of persistence and recurrence of seizures following temporal resection. Brain 123 Pt 12, 2445–2466. doi:10.1093/brain/123.12.2445. Holmes, M. D., Wilensky, A. J., Ojemann, L. M., and Ojemann, G. A. (1999). Predicting outcome following reoperation for medically intractable epilepsy. Seizure 8, 103–106. doi:10.1053/seiz.1998.0256. Jehi, L. E., Silveira, D. C., Bingaman, W., and Najm, I. (2010a). Temporal lobe epilepsy surgery failures: predictors of seizure recurrence, yield of reevaluation, and outcome following reoperation. J. Neurosurg. 113, 1186–1194. doi:10.3171/2010.8.JNS10180. Jehi, L., Sarkis, R., Bingaman, W., Kotagal, P., and Najm, I. (2010b). When is a postoperative seizure equivalent to “epilepsy recurrence” after epilepsy surgery? Epilepsia 51, 994–1003. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02556.x. Juhasz, C., Chugani, D. C., Padhye, U. N., Muzik, O., Shah, A., Asano, E., et al. (2004). Evaluation with alpha-[11C]methyl-L-tryptophan positron emission tomography for reoperation after failed epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia 45, 124–130. Jung, R., Aull-Watschinger, S., Moser, D., Czech, T., Baumgartner, C., Bonelli-Nauer, S., et al. (2013). Is reoperation an option for patients with temporal lobe epilepsy after failure of surgery? Seizure 22, 502–506. doi:10.1016/j.seizure.2012.11.011. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., and PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339, b2535. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19622551 [Accessed March 6, 2017]. Pati, S., Abla, A. A., Rekate, H. L., and Ng, Y.-T. (2011). Repeat surgery for hypothalamic hamartoma in refractory epilepsy. Neurosurg. Focus 30, E3 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21374831. doi:10.3171/2010.11.FOCUS10248. Ramantani, G., Strobl, K., Stathi, A., Brandt, A., Schubert-Bast, S., Wiegand, G., et al. (2013). Reoperation for refractory epilepsy in childhood: A second chance for selected patients. Neurosurgery 73, 695–704. doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000081. Ramos, E., Benbadis, S., and Vale, F. L. (2009). Failure of temporal lobe resection for epilepsy in patients with mesial temporal sclerosis: results and treatment options. J. Neurosurg. 110, 1127–1134. doi:10.3171/2009.1.JNS08638. Salanova, V., Andermann, F., Rasmussen, T., Olivier, A., and Quesney, L. (1996). The running down phenomenon in temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain 119, 989–996. doi:10.1093/brain/119.3.989. Salanova, V., Markand, O., and Worth, R. (2005). Temporal lobe epilepsy: Analysis of failures and the role of reoperation. Acta Neurol. Scand. 111, 126–133. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00371.x. Salanova, V., Quesney, L. F., Rasmussen, T., Andermann, F., and Olivier, A. (1994). Reevaluation of Surgical Failures and the Role of Reoperation in 39 Patients with Frontal Lobe Epilepsy. Epilepsia 35, 70–80. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1157.1994.tb02914.x. Sampson, J. H., and Barker, F. G. (2014). Methodology and Reporting of Meta-Analyses in the Neurosurgical Literature. J. Neurosurg. 120, 791–95. Schulz, R., Hoppe, M., Boesebeck, F., Gyimesi, C., Pannek, H. W., Woermann, F. G., et al. (2011). Analysis of reoperation in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis. Neurosurgery 68, 89–97. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181fdf8f8. Schwartz, T. H. T. H., and Spencer, D. D. D. D. (2001). Strategies for reoperation after comprehensive epilepsy surgery. J. Neurosurg. 95, 615–623. doi:10.3171/jns.2001.95.4.0615. Shaver, E. G., Harvey, A. S., Morrison, G., Prats, A., Jayakar, P., Dean, P., et al. (1997). Results and Complicatoins After Reoperation for Failed Epilepsy Surgery in Children. Pediatr. Neurosurg. 27, 194–202. Siegel, a M., Cascino, G. D., Meyer, F. B., McClelland, R. L., So, E. L., Marsh, W. R., et al. (2004). Resective reoperation for failed epilepsy surgery: seizure outcome in 64 patients. Neurology 63, 2298–2302. doi:10.1212/01.WNL.0000147476.86575.A7. Spencer, S., and Huh, L. (2008). Outcomes of epilepsy surgery in adults and children. Lancet Neurol. 7, 525–537. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70109-1. Surges, R., and Elger, C. E. (2013). Reoperation after failed resective epilepsy surgery. Seizure 22, 493–501. doi:10.1016/j.seizure.2013.04.020. Tahry, R. El, and Wang, I. Z. (2017). Failed epilepsy surgery: is this the end? Acta Neurol. Belg. doi:10.1007/s13760-017-0769-8. Vale, F. L., Ahmadian, A., Youssef, A. S., Tatum, W. O., and Benbadis, S. R. (2011). Long-term outcome of vagus nerve stimulation therapy after failed epilepsy surgery. Seizure 20, 244–248. doi:10.1016/j.seizure.2010.12.003. Vale, F. L., Pollock, G., and Benbadis, S. R. (2012). Failed epilepsy surgery for mesial temporal lobe sclerosis: a review of the pathophysiology. Neurosurg. Focus 32, E9. doi:10.3171/2011.12.FOCUS11318. Wyler, a R., Hermann, B. P., and Richey, E. T. (1989). Results of reoperation for failed epilepsy surgery. J. Neurosurg. 71, 815–819. doi:10.3171/jns.1989.71.6.0815. Zachenhofer, I., Novak, K., Baumgartner, C., Prayer, D., and Czech, T. (2011). Reoperation after selective amygdalohippocampectomy: An MRI analysis of the extent of temporomesial resection in ten cases. Acta Neurochir. (Wien). 153, 239–248. doi:10.1007/s00701-010-0802-7.

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy