Skip to main content
  • Early Reherniation Rates Associated with a High-Risk Subgroup of the Lumbar Discectomy Population: Identification of a Treatment Gap in a Multi-Center, Prospective, Randomized Study

    Final Number:
    1118

    Authors:
    Matthew J. McGirt MD; Frederic Martens MD; Gerrit Joan Bouma MD; Adisa Kuršumovic; Claudius Thomé; Silky Chotai MD; P. D. Klassen

    Study Design:
    Clinical Trial

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2017 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Studies investigating the outcomes of limited discectomy typically report results on a general discectomy population. High rates of lumbar disc reherniation, however, would indicate a treatment gap that may be masked without sub-group analysis. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether such a treatment gap exists in a subgroup of the limited discectomy population having large / massive anular tears and the outcomes of a bone-anchored anular closure device (Fig.1) aimed at reducing early reherniation rates (=90 days).

    Methods: Prospective, multicenter, randomized (1:1), controlled trial comparing outcomes of patients receiving standard limited discectomy only (control; n=278) or limited discectomy with anular closure device (ACD) (n=272) for symptomatic single-level posterior/posterolateral disc herniation (L1-S1). Anular defect inclusion criteria: 4-6mm (height) by 6-10mm (width). Symptomatic reherniation rates within 90 days were compared between treatment groups using Fisher’s exact test (p=0.05).

    Results: Preoperative demographics and post-discectomy measures were similar across groups (p=0.321). Overall symptomatic reherniation rate within 90 days for both groups combined was 3% (17/550). The control group accounted for 82% (14/17) of reherniations. Rate of reherniation in the ACD group was significantly decreased versus controls (p=0.01). A clinically meaningful finding was that the entire study population had already accrued a third of the symptomatic herniations within 90 days as has been reported at 8 years in the generalized discectomy literature.

    Conclusions: Early rehernation rates observed in this multi-center study demonstrate a treatment gap within a high-risk discectomy subgroup, particularly for the control group. At 90 days, this subgroup is on a trajectory to surpass long-term failure rates in the general discectomy population, perhaps even by 2 years. Closing the treatment gap will require more durable means of anular closure such as ACD implantation, which significantly reduced the reherniation rate in these high-risk patients.

    Patient Care: An unmet need in a high-risk subgroup of the discectomy population has been identified. The outcomes of this analysis show that an ACD can potentially mitigate the early postoperative risk of reherniation in this at-risk population, providing the patient with the greatest likelihood of long-term success

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to discuss/identify: 1. Whether limited discectomy, large anular defect patients represent a sub-group for which a treatment gap exists 2. Whether an ACD decreases risk of early postoperative reherniation to close the treatment gap.

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy