In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Endovascular Thrombectomy Alone versus Combined Intravenous Thrombolysis and Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Final Number:
    121

    Authors:
    Kevin Phan BSc MPhil; Adam Dmytriw; Christoph Johannes Griessenauer MD; Justin M Moore B.Med.Sci (hon), MD, PhD; Christopher S. Ogilvy MD; Ajith J. Thomas MD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2017 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: To date, no randomized trial has directly addressed the question of whether IV tPA improves the outcomes of IV tPA-eligible patients who will eventually undergo EVT or whether a direct EVT strategy will be equally effective.

    Methods: We performed a search on 6 electronic databases publications up until January 2017. All prospective and retrospective articles on comparing the efficacy and safety between mechanical thrombectomy (MT) alone and combined thrombectomy with IV tPA (MT + IVT) were included. The modified Rankin scale score between 0-2 at 90 days was used to analysed the primary efficacy whereby the primary safety outcome was all-cause mortality at 90 days. Summary relative risks and 95% confidence intervals calculated with a fixed-effects or random-effects model where appropriate.

    Results: 12 studies were included for analysis, comprising 1275 in the EVT only arm and 1340 in the combined EVT+IV tPA arm. Good functional outcomes (mRS=2) was not statistically significant when comparing EVT versus EVT+IV tPA (44% vs 48%, OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64, 1.002, P=0.052). Similar findings was found in the primary safety outcome, 90-day mortality rates (20.4% vs 19.4%, OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.83, 1.71, P=0.34). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was also not significantly different between EVT versus EVT+IV tPA (3.7% vs 3.8%, OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.65-1.48, P=0.91).

    Conclusions: Overall, no significant difference was found between the groups in terms of favorable functional outcome, mortality rate or complications including symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Our results suggest that a subset of acute ischemic stroke patients may benefit from a direct EVT alone approach.

    Patient Care: Our meta-analysis the first to pool direct comparative studies of patients receiving EVT alone versus EVT+IV tPA. No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of favourable functional outcome, mortality rate or complications including symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. These results suggest there may be a subset of acute ischemic stroke patients who may benefit from a direct EVT alone approach.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion, participants should be able to (1) outline the differences in discharge and 90d outcomes of EVT vs EVT+IVT approach for ischemic stroke

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy