In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • The Relationship Between Repeat Resection and Overall Survival in Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients: A Time-Dependent Analysis

    Final Number:
    1256

    Authors:
    Viviane S. Tabar MD; Katherine S Panageas; Debra Goldman; koos E Hovinga MD; Yoshua Esquenazi MD; Anne Reiner

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2017 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: The relationship between repeat resection and overall survival (OS) in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients has been the subject of multiple studies. But most investigations ignored timing of repeat resection and may have led to biased conclusions. Statistical methods which take time into account are well-established and applied consistently in other medical fields. Our goal was to illustrate the change in the effect of repeat resection on OS in GBM patients once timing of resection is incorporated.

    Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients initially diagnosed between January 2005 and December 2014 with GBM treated at our institution. Patients underwent at least one craniotomy with both pre- and post-operative MRI data available. The effect of repeat resection on OS was assessed with time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression controlling for extent of resection, initial KPS, gender, age, multifocal status, eloquence, and postoperative treatment.

    Results: Eighty nine of 163 patients (55%) had repeat resection with a median time between resections of 7.7 months (range:0.5-50.8). Median OS was 18.8 months (95%CI: 16.3-20.5) from initial resection. When timing of repeat resection was ignored, repeat resection was associated with a lower risk of death (HR:0.62, 95%CI: 0.43-0.90,p=.01); however, when timing was taken into account, repeat resection was not associated with improved survival and in fact patients had a higher risk of death (HR:2.19, 95%CI: 1.47-3.28,p<.001).

    Conclusions: In our study, accounting for timing of repeat resection reversed its protective effect on OS, suggesting repeat resection may not benefit patients’ OS. While caveats pertaining to retrospective studies apply, our findings emphasize the need to account for timing using time-dependent methods in the evaluation of repeat resection on OS.

    Patient Care: The work will provide important informatio to be considered in the decision making process for repeat surgery in recurrent glioblastoma

    Learning Objectives: The participant will learn about time-dependent statistical methods and the role of repeat resection of recurrent glioblastoma tumors

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy