In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Endoscopic Extended Minipterional Craniotomy Versus Transorbital Endoscopic Approach to the Anterior and Middle Cranial Fossae: an Anatomical Study

    Final Number:
    1598

    Authors:
    Raywat Noiphithak MD; Juan Carlos Yanez-Siller MD; Juan Manuel Revuelta Barbero MD; Bradley A. Otto; Ricardo Carrau MD; Daniel M. Prevedello MD

    Study Design:
    Laboratory Investigation

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2017 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Minimally invasive access to the skull base is a surgical challenge. In this study, we quantitatively analyzed and compared an endoscopic extended minipterional craniotomy (EMPT) with the transorbital endoscopic approach (TOEA) to anterior and middle cranial fossae (ACF and MCF, respectively).

    Methods: EMPTs and TOEAs were carried out in five silicone-injected cadaveric heads (10 sides). Dissections were performed under endoscopic visualization and with the guidance of a neuro-navigation system. For each approach, measurements of the area of exposure, surgical freedom and angles of attack to different surgical targets in ACF and MCF, were obtained for statistical comparison.

    Results: No statistically significant differences were found among the mean area of exposure afforded by EMPT and TOEA for ACF and MCF (p = 0.709 and 0.317, respectively). For ACF, the mean area of exposure was of 13.4 ± 2.6 cm2 (mean ± SD) versus 13.0 ± 1.9 cm2 achieved by EMPT and TOEA, respectively. Compared to TOEA, EMPT produced a significantly larger area of surgical freedom for all surgical targets, except for the crista galli. Similarly, EMPT allowed for significantly greater angles of attack in the vertical axis for all targets, except for the crista galli. In contrast, the horizontal attack angles were similar among all approaches.

    Conclusions: EMPT and TOEA, are two minimally invasive techniques that provide similar and adequate areas of exposure of ACF and MCF; although TOEA offers limited maneuverability. Additional research is needed to learn more about the safety and efficacy of these innovative techniques, as well as to establish their precise clinical application.

    Patient Care: This study will provide extra knowledge of the advantages and limitations offered by these novel minimally invasive techniques.

    Learning Objectives: 1. To highlight the advantages of modern minimally invasive neurosurgical techniques. 2. To describe the surgical nuances of an endoscopic extended minipterional cranitomy and the transorbital approach to anterior and middle fossa 3. To quantitively analyze and compare the surgical exposures and degrees of maneuverability provided by each approach.

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy