In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Defining the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for Grade I Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: Insights from the Quality Outcomes Database

    Final Number:
    4006

    Authors:
    A. Asher; P. Kerezoudis; P. Mummaneni; E. Bisson; S. Glassman; K. Foley; J. Slotkin; E. Potts; M. Shaffrey; C. Shaffrey; D. Coric; J. Knightly; P. Park; KM Fu; C. Devin; K. Archer; S. Chotai; A. Chan; M. Virk; M. Bydon

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2017 Annual Meeting - Late Breaking Science

    Introduction: The objective of this study is to determine the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) associated with surgical treatment for lumbar spondylolisthesis

    Methods: We queried the Quality Outcomes Database registry from July 2014 through December 2015 for patients undergoing posterior lumbar surgery for grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis. Recorded patient reported outcomes included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EQ-5D, numeric rating scale (NRS)-leg pain and -back pain. Anchor-based (using the NASS satisfaction scale) and distribution-based (half a standard deviation, small Cohen’s effect size, standard error of measurement and minimum detectable change (MDC)) methods were used.

    Results: A total of 441 patients (80 laminectomies alone, 361 fusions) from 11 participating sites were included in the analysis. Change in functional outcomes scores between baseline and 1-year were 23.5 ± 17.4 points for ODI, 0.24 ± 0.23 for EQ-5D, 4.1 ± 3.5 for NRS-LP, and 3.7 ± 3.2 for NRS-BP. The different calculation methods generated a range of MCID values for each PRO: 3.3 to 26.5 points for ODI, 0.04 to 0.3 points for EQ-5D, 0.6 to 5.5 points for NRS-leg pain and 0.5 to 4.1 points for NRS-back pain. The MDC approach appeared to be the most appropriate for calculating MCID because it provided a threshold greater than the measurement error and was closest to the average change difference between the satisfied and not satisfied patients. On subgroup analysis, the MCID thresholds for laminectomy alone patients were comparable to those undergoing arthrodesis as well as the entire cohort.

    Conclusions: Based on the MDC method, the MCID values are 14.3 points for ODI, 0.2 points for EQ-5D, 1.7 points for leg pain, and 1.6 points for back pain.

    Patient Care: The percentage of patients reaching MCID can serve as an appropriate marker for screening interventions that might be inefficient and add unnecessary financial burden to the health care system.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) discuss the different methods for calculating MCID 2) understand the difference between anchor- and distribution- based methods 3) define the MCID for patients with lumbar degenerative grade I spondylolisthesis.

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy