In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Assessment of the Criterion Validity of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons Microanastomosis Assessment Scale

    Final Number:
    1030

    Authors:
    Andrew R Pines MA; Samer Zammar MD; Rami James N Aoun MD; Mithun G. Sattur MCh; Mathew Welz; Kristin R. Swanson PhD; Chandan Krishna MD; Bernard R. Bendok MD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2016 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: In order to train the largest number of students to the highest objective standard, the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) developed modules to simulate different procedures, along with scales to assess performance. The Northwestern Objective Microanastomosis Assessment Tool (NOMAT) is the scale that accompanies the CNS Microanastomosis module. The next step in validation of this scale is evaluating the criterion validity and the internal consistency of the NOMAT.

    Methods: The Microanastomosis course was given during the 2015 annual CNS meeting. The module consisted of a written pretest, a didactic session, and a live demonstration of the microanastomosis technique. This was followed by a hands-on session. Each resident was situated with a microscope (OPMI pico Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), microsurgical tools, 10-0 Nylon suture, and a 1mm synthetic vessel (Biomet, Warsaw, IN). The residents were asked to cut the vessel and re-anastomose it back in an end to end fashion with interrupted stitches. During this time, each student was graded based on the NOMAT scale. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software (IBM, Armonk, NY) using a linear regression model for criterion validity and Cronbach’s Alpha test for internal consistency.

    Results: Thirty one residents participated in the course. The Cronbach’s Alpha score for the NOMAT was 0.939. Linear regression analysis revealed an adjusted R2 of 0.856 (p=0.001). Deviation of scores between residents of the same year was inversely related to PGY year of the group.

    Conclusions: The NOMAT is further validated by a Crohbach’s alpha score that suggests each item of the scale is important, and adjusted R2 score that suggests that the scale can reliably distinguish between levels of the different performance exhibited by residents at varying levels of training.

    Patient Care: This research validates the scale used to evaluate neurosurgical residents during simulation training. Such training modules and scales are an important component of the modern neurosurgical curriculum and integral to enhance resident surgical skills.

    Learning Objectives: To determine the criterion validity and the internal consistency of the NOMAT scale.

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy