In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Minimally Invasive Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma in the ICU as a Safe and Cost-Effective Alternative to Burr Hole Surgery

    Final Number:
    600

    Authors:
    Jordan P. Amadio AB MD MBA; Bruno Soares MD; Jon Timothy Willie MD PhD

    Study Design:
    Clinical Trial

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2016 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: In symptomatic chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH) necessitating neurosurgical evacuation, drainage via a minimally invasive twist drill craniostomy performed at bedside in the ICU has been proposed as an alternative to standard burr hole evacuation performed in the OR.

    Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the single-institution, single-surgeon experience of 49 consecutive cSDH evacuation procedures. Patients presenting with symptomatic cSDH were initially assigned to either twist drill craniostomy (at bedside in ICU, under conscious sedation) or burr hole evacuation (in OR) by the attending neurosurgeon. All patients had a large-bore subdural catheter left in place during clinical and radiographic inpatient followup.

    Results: 43 patients underwent 18 bedside and 31 OR procedures. At baseline, the bedside and OR groups were similar in age (79.8 vs. 81.9 years), gender, and radiographic characteristics of cSDH composition, thickness, and mass effect. Complications were of similar incidence, with need for 2 repeat procedures in the bedside group and 3 reoperations in the OR group due to reaccumulation. All other patients had a satisfactory clinical-radiographic result. The incidence of postoperative pneumocephalus (Grade 2 or higher) was lower after bedside procedures (28% vs. 48%, p=0.03). No patients initially treated at bedside required conversion to surgery, although 2 patients treated with burr holes in the OR later underwent bedside drainage. No mortalities. Postoperative recovery was enhanced in the bedside group, with more patients discharged to home (75% vs. 55%, p=0.01) as well as trends toward shorter mean length of stay in ICU (3.2 vs. 4.1 days) and hospital (6.8 vs. 8.5 days).

    Conclusions: Minimally invasive bedside drainage of cSDH in the ICU represents a viable alternative to standard burr hole surgery. Whereas the bedside and OR groups had equivalent clinical-radiographic outcomes, elderly patients undergoing bedside drainage showed evidence of better postoperative recovery and reduced healthcare resource utilization.

    Patient Care: A greater appreciation for the technique of subdural hematoma drainage via twist drill at bedside in the ICU may lead to reduced cost, better patient outcomes in terms of length-of-stay, and expanded treatment options for patients who are too elderly or infirm to undergo general anesthesia in the OR.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) Compare the surgical techniques of burr hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma in the OR versus the minimally invasive approach via craniostomy in the ICU; 2) Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of minimally invasive subdural hematoma drainage, in terms of resource utilization, patient outcome, and patient eligibility; 3) Identify an effective set of treatment options for neurosurgical patients presenting with chronic subdural hematoma; 4) Discuss future directions of clinical research on techniques for draining subdural hematoma, including the need for additional prospective data.

    References: 1. Alcalá-Cerra G, Young AMH, Moscote-Salazar LR, Paternina-Caicedo Á: Efficacy and safety of subdural drains after burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematomas: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Neurosurg:2014 Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875014007153. 2. Almenawer S a, Farrokhyar F, Hong C, Alhazzani W, Manoranjan B, Yarascavitch B, et al.: Chronic subdural hematoma management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34,829 patients. Ann Surg 259:449–57, 2014 Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24096761. 3. Camel M, Grubb RL: Treatment of chronic subdural hematoma by twist-drill craniotomy with continuous catheter drainage. J Neurosurg 65:183–187, 1986 4. Chari A, Kolias AG, Santarius T, Bond S, Hutchinson PJ: Twist-drill craniostomy with hollow screws for evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma. J Neurosurg 121:176–83, 2014 Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24785319. 5. Escosa Baé M, Wessling H, Salca HC, De Las Heras Echeverría P: Use of twist-drill craniostomy with drain in evacuation of chronic subdural hematomas: Independent predictors of recurrence. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 153:1097–1103, 2011 6. Horn EM, Feiz-Erfan I, Bristol RE, Spetzler RF, Harrington TR: Bedside twist drill craniostomy for chronic subdural hematoma: A comparative study. Surg Neurol 65:150–153, 2006 7. Lind CRP, Lind CJ, Mee EW: Reduction in the number of repeated operations for the treatment of subacute and chronic subdural hematomas by placement of subdural drains. J Neurosurg 99:44–46, 2003 8. Mondorf Y, Abu-Owaimer M, Gaab MR, Oertel JMK: Chronic subdural hematoma--craniotomy versus burr hole trepanation. Br J Neurosurg 23:612–616, 2009 9. Sabatier P: Percutaneous treatment of chronic subdural hematoma by twist drill and continuous drainage. Retrospective study of 65 cases. Neurochirurgie 47:488–490, 2001 10. Santarius T, Kirkpatrick PJ, Ganesan D, Chia HL, Jalloh I, Smielewski P, et al.: Use of drains versus no drains after burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 374:1067–1073, 2009 11. Tabaddor K, Shulmon K: Definitive treatment of chronic subdural hematoma by twist-drill craniostomy and closed-system drainage. J Neurosurg 46:220–226, 1977 12. Williams GR, Baskaya MK, Menendez J, Polin R, Willis B, Nanda A: Burr-hole versus twist-drill drainage for the evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma: a comparison of clinical results. J Clin Neurosci 8:551–554, 2001

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy