Skip to main content
  • Successful Flow Diversion of Cerebral Aneurysms in Plavix Hyporesponders (PRU ≥ 200): An Argument for Antiplatelet Monotherapy?

    Final Number:
    551

    Authors:
    Geoffrey P. Colby MD, PhD; Li-Mei Lin BA; Daniel Lubelski MD; Matthew Bender MD; Risheng Xu AB AM MD PhD; Bowen Jiang MD; Judy Huang MD; Rafael J. Tamargo MD; Alexander Lewis Coon MD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2016 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Endovascular aneurysm treatment by flow diversion has classically relied on dual anti-platelet therapy with Aspirin and Plavix to reduce thrombotic complications. The heterogenous Plavix response of patients has made P2Y12 testing increasingly popular. Plavix hyporesponders (defined as PRU=200) are often re-dosed with Plavix or switched to alternate anti-platelet regimens. However, little clinical validation exists for these practices, and they might actually increase risks of hemorrhagic complications. We sought to evaluate periprocedural outcomes following flow diversion in patients maintained on standard Aspirin and Plavix regimens with PRU=200.

    Methods: A single-center prospectively collected aneurysm database was reviewed for adult patients on standard dual antiplatelet regimens (Aspirin 325mg + Plavix 75mg daily) who underwent endovascular embolization of ICA and proximal ACA/Acom aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED). Patients with pre-embolization P2Y12 testing and PRU=200 were included.

    Results: 49 patients (mean age 56, 74% women) met inclusion criteria. Forty-seven (96%) patients had a single aneurysm treated, and 2 (4%) had 2 aneurysms treated; 84% of the aneurysms were on the ICA and 16% were on the ACA (Acom and A1-2). Aneurysm size ranged from 2-28mm. PED length ranged from 10-35mm. Pre-procedure PRU levels ranged from 200 to 361. ReoPro was administered in 5/49 (10%) cases, with platelet plug visualized in 4/49 cases (8%). Four patients (8%) had transient neurological deficits (resolved completely during hospital stay), with only 1 of these requiring ReoPro during the procedure. No patients had major or minor permanent strokes, and no patients had hemorrhagic complications.

    Conclusions: Hyporesponse to Plavix (PRU=200) is not a contraindication to aneurysm treatment with the PED in patients on a standard dual antiplatelet regimen of Aspirin 325mg and Plavix 75mg daily. These data suggest a diminutive role of Plavix in preventing thrombotic complications during these procedures.

    Patient Care: This work will help us define the role of dual anti-platelet medications in preventing thrombotic complications during Pipeline embolization.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to recognize that Pipeline embolization can be performed safely and effectively in patients on Aspirin and Plavix with PRU > 200. This challenges the traditional thought that dual anti-platelet medications are required for safe aneurysm treatment with flow diverters.

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy