In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Postoperative Cognitive Status Testing in Brain Tumor Patients: Review and Recommendations

    Final Number:
    1543

    Authors:
    Abraham Geller; Brooke Fortin; Hassan Dawood; Heloise M. Dubois; Timothy R Smith MD PhD MPH

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2016 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Cognitive outcomes following brain surgery are an important component of quality of life (QOL) and long-term functional status. Increasingly, emphasis is placed on outcome measures to assess surgical quality. Postoperative cognitive status provides an objective, interrogable endpoint for clinical use. Despite this, information on postoperative cognitive outcomes of brain tumor patients remains sparse, and postoperative assessment of cognitive status is not part of routine follow-up care in these patients. Here we analyze and compare the quality of neuropsychological tests used in the assessment of postoperative cognitive outcomes of brain tumor patients.

    Methods: Tests were included if they had evidence of being used to assess cognition in brain tumor patients following surgical tumor resection. PubMed and PsychInfo were queried for all publications related to cognitive outcomes in brain tumor patients, yielding 28 tests. To allow comparisons and determine relative value, specific quality variables for each test were investigated: number of cognitive domains assessed, depth of each domain, time to administer, performance compared to other tests, and objective efficacy measures including sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and ROC AUC.

    Results: Among 28 tests analyzed, the modified mini-mental state exam, Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Exam – Revised, and the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Exam scored highest in our assessment. Each scored highly in objective efficacy measures, covered a broad range of cognitive domains, and was widely accepted in the medical community. When compared to other tests considered, these three returned greater sensitivity/specificity and lower false negative rates for detecting cognitive impairment.

    Conclusions: Neuropsychological testing should be a routine part of outcome tracking. We recommend these tests be incorporated into standard outcome tracking for brain tumor patients following surgery to better capture this important aspect of postoperative functional status and QOL. Future research may utilize cognitive outcome data to compare surgical approaches, identify best practices, and improve patient outcomes.

    Patient Care: Cognitive ability is an important contributor to quality of life and functional status following brain surgery. Currently, little data sheds light on postoperative cognitive status of brain tumor patients and little research has been done to determine the best way to track cognitive outcomes. This work extensively analyzes different neuropsychological tests and assesses the relative validity, quality, and applicability of each in order to identify the best way to track postoperative cognitive outcomes in brain tumor patients. By providing surgeons with information on how best to monitor cognitive status in patients, we hope to improve tracking of this important outcome measure. As more information is generated, future research can correlate cognitive outcomes with pre- and peri-operative factors and intra-operative variables to identify best practices and predict cognitive status outcomes a priori.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) Describe the importance of assessing cognitive outcomes in brain tumor patients following surgery, 2) Discuss the ways in which increased tracking and reporting of postoperative cognitive status can be used to improve patient care, and 3) Identify at least one high-quality neuropsychological test that can be used to dependably and informatively screen for cognitive deficits in neurosurgical patients.

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy