Skip to main content
  • Trends in Secondary Diagnosis of Cerebral Edema or Brain Compression in Brain Tumor Patients in New York State, 2000-2012

    Final Number:
    1021

    Authors:
    tyler schmidt; Christine Ann Pittman MPH; Adam wilford; Charles Lee BS; Helen S Wei; Kristopher T. Kimmell MD; Kevin A. Walter MD; G. Edward Vates

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2016 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Edema is a common consequence of brain tumors, but the impact on healthcare costs is unrecognized. We hypothesized that changes in reimbursement and documentation incentivized capture of the complexity of patients undergoing surgery by documenting secondary diagnoses. We examined temporal patterns of ICD-9 procedure/diagnosis codes unique to brain tumor surgery across New York State from 2000-2012.

    Methods: The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database was queried to identify patients with ICD-9 primary diagnosis of brain tumor (191.0-192.1, 192.8-9, 225.0, or 237.5) and relevant primary procedure (01.13,closed brain biopsy; 01.14,open brain biopsy; 01.51, excision of meninges; 01.53, lobectomy; 01.59, other brain resection). Secondary diagnoses of 348.5 (cerebral edema) or 348.4 (brain compression) were tabulated. Trends from 2000-2012 were tested for significance using chi squared and ANOVA analysis.

    Results: A total of 18,927 admissions for brain tumor surgery from 2000-2012 were identified. The annual number remained constant, but there was significant increase in associated diagnosis of cerebral edema from 3.6% (2000) to 39.5% (2012). There was a marked inflection from 2008 (7.5%) to 2009 (16%) and again in 2011 (36%). Differences in the reported secondary diagnosis of compression were also significant (1.1% in 2000, 8.5% in 2012) but less profound.

    Conclusions: There was a log order increase in proportion of tumor patients diagnosed with brain edema between 2000-2012. A less pronounced increase was observed with brain compression. Without a clear change in brain tumor biology from 2000-2012, the increase in brain edema secondary diagnosis may be linked to financial incentives and the ease of capturing data from electronic medical records. This may dramatically impact costs associated with brain tumor treatment, but its impact on quality and cost effectiveness remains unknown.

    Patient Care: With the continued implementation of healthcare reform cost conscious care remains an important priority. Our research identifies trends in capturing the complexity of brain tumor patients which allows for appropriate reimbursement. By identifying the economic impact of secondary diagnoses on one of the most common neurosurgical procedures subsequent optimization will improve the cost and ultimately the quality of patient care.

    Learning Objectives: 1) Identify the temporal trend of the secondary diagnoses cerebral edema and brain compression associated with surgery for brain neoplasms. 2) Discuss the causes and implications of this trend on brain tumor surgery. 3) Describe the economic impact of secondary diagnoses and discuss optimization to provide cost-effective high quality care for brain tumor patients.

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy