Skip to main content
  • Treatment of Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms by Flow Diversion With the Pipeline Embolization Device: A Single Center Experience in 44 Cases

    Final Number:
    539

    Authors:
    Geoffrey P. Colby MD, PhD, FAANS; Li-Mei Lin MD; Matthew Bender MD; Justin M. Caplan MD; Judy Huang MD; Rafael J. Tamargo MD; Alexander Lewis Coon MD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2016 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Anterior communicating artery (AcoA) aneurysms represent a challenge for open and endovascular surgery. Flow diversion is a increasingly accepted treatment for a variety of intracranial aneurysms. We present a large, single-center case series of patients with AcoA region aneurysms that were treated using the Pipeline embolization device (PED).

    Methods: A single-center prospectively collected aneurysm database was reviewed to identify patients who underwent endovascular embolization of AcoA region aneurysms with PED.

    Results: 37 patients underwent 44 procedures for treatment of ACoA region aneurysms with the PED, of which 42 (95%) were successfully completed. Six patients had bilateral stents placed in an H-configuration. Nineteen patients were female (51%) and the average age was 57 years. The average aneurysm size was 4.6mm +/-3.0mm. Seventeen patients (46%) had prior subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Six aneurysms were previously clipped (16%), 12 were previously coiled (32%), and 19 had no prior treatment (51%). PED were placed from A1 to ipsilateral A2 in 40 cases (95%) and to the contralateral A2 in two cases (5%). Balloon angioplasty was employed in three cases (7%) and coils were used adjunctively in two cases (5%). Mean follow-up duration was 8.8 months, at which time 28/32 (95%) of aneurysms were occluded. Follow-up data was not available for 10 patients; eight were within six months of stent placement and two were lost to follow-up. Complications included transient neurological deficit in two patients (5%), one with small ipsilateral ICH. Two patients experienced in-stent thrombosis, with one resulting in major stroke. Zero patients had post-procedural SAH. There were zero mortalities. Overall, major, permanent neurological deficit occurred in 1/44 cases (2.2%) or 1/37 patients (2.7%).

    Conclusions: The PED can be used safely and effectively in the treatment of ACoA-region aneurysms. This represents a good alternative treatment option in addition to microsurgical clipping and endovascular coiling.

    Patient Care: This introduces flow diversion as a novel treatment for anterior communicating artery aneurysms

    Learning Objectives: 1. Understand applications of the pipeline embolization device (PED) 2. Consider the treatment alternatives for anterior communicating artery-region aneurysms 3. Evaluate the efficacy and complications associated with PED treatment of ACoA-region aneurysms

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy