Skip to main content
  • Surgical and Oncological Outcomes for Total En Bloc Spondylectomy of Lumbar Spine Primary Malignant Tumors.

    Final Number:
    1264

    Authors:
    Daniel M. Sciubba BS, MD; C. Rory Goodwin MD PhD; Rafael De la Garza-Ramos BA; Risheng Xu AB AM MD PhD; Nancy A Abu-Bonsrah BS; Ziya L. Gokaslan MD; Jean-Paul Wolinsky MD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2016 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) is an aggressive surgical technique that may be employed in the treatment of spinal neoplasms. We sought to report our experience with TES in the lumbar spine, and examine complication rates and reoperation rates for patients with primary malignant/aggressive spinal tumors.

    Methods: A retrospective review of 23 neurosurgical patients operated on between 2004 and 2014 was performed. Outcomes included perioperative complication rates and reoperation rates for instrumentation failure/pseudoarthrosis. The relationship between patient/operative parameters and complication development/instrumentation failure was investigated.

    Results: There were 15 men (65.2%) and eight women (24.8%), with a median age at surgery of 47 years. The most common tumor was chordoma in 11 patients (47.8%), followed by sarcoma in four (17.4%), and giant cell tumor in three (13.0%). All patients but one underwent a two-staged operation; median total estimated blood loss was 3200 mL, and median total operative time was 18.5 hours. At least 15 patients developed one perioperative complication (65.2%), with the most common being wound infection and ileus, each with an incidence of 26.1% (n=6). There was one case of intraoperative iliac vein injury (4.4%). Instrumentation failure occurred in 9 patients (39.1%) at a median time of 23 months after index spondylectomy. Following logistic regression, there were no factors associated with complication development. On the other hand, postoperative radiation was significantly associated with instrumentation failure (OR 7.49; 95% CI, 1.02 – 54.9). Median follow-up time for all patients was 50 months (IQR, 24 – 75).

    Conclusions: Although studies have demonstrated favorable outcomes after en bloc resection of spinal tumors, TES in the lumbar spine remains a challenging procedure. Future investigation into complication avoidance and reconstruction techniques is encouraged.

    Patient Care: Total en bloc spondylectomy in the lumbar spine represents a unique challenge given the unique anatomy of this region. This is a feasible procedure in carefully selected patients, but the risk for perioperative complication development and late instrumentation failure should be acknowledged.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) Describe surgical outcomes after total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) for primary aggressive/malignant tumors of the lumbar spine.

    References: 1. Kato S, Murakami H, Demura S, Yoshioka K, Kawahara N, Tomita K, Tsuchiya H (2014) Patient-reported outcome and quality of life after total en bloc spondylectomy for a primary spinal tumour. Bone Joint J 96-B:1693-1698. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B12.33832 2. Luzzati AD, Shah S, Gagliano F, Perrucchini G, Scotto G, Alloisio M (2015) Multilevel en bloc spondylectomy for tumors of the thoracic and lumbar spine is challenging but rewarding. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:858-867. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3578-x 3. Kato S, Murakami H, Demura S, Yoshioka K, Kawahara N, Tomita K, Tsuchiya H (2014) More than 10-year follow-up after total en bloc spondylectomy for spinal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 21:1330-1336. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3333-7 4. Amendola L, Cappuccio M, De Iure F, Bandiera S, Gasbarrini A, Boriani S (2014) En bloc resections for primary spinal tumors in 20 years of experience: effectiveness and safety. Spine J 14:2608-2617. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.02.030 5. Tomita K, Kawahara N, Baba H, Tsuchiya H, Fujita T, Toribatake Y (1997) Total en bloc spondylectomy. A new surgical technique for primary malignant vertebral tumors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:324-333 6. Liljenqvist U, Lerner T, Halm H, Buerger H, Gosheger G, Winkelmann W (2008) En bloc spondylectomy in malignant tumors of the spine. Eur Spine J 17:600-609. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0599-8 7. Yokogawa N, Murakami H, Demura S, Kato S, Yoshioka K, Hayashi H, Ishii T, Igarashi T, Fang X, Tsuchiya H (2014) Perioperative complications of total en bloc spondylectomy: adverse effects of preoperative irradiation. PLoS One 9:e98797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098797 8. Matsumoto M, Watanabe K, Tsuji T, Ishii K, Nakamura M, Chiba K, Toyama Y (2011) Late instrumentation failure after total en bloc spondylectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 15:320-327. doi: 10.3171/2011.5.SPINE10813 9. Jawad MU, Scully SP (2010) In brief: classifications in brief: enneking classification: benign and malignant tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:2000-2002. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1315-7 10. Lievre JA, Darcy M, Pradat P, Camus JP, Benichou C, Attali P, Joublin M (1968) [Giant cell tumor of the lumbar spine; total spondylectomy in 2 states]. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic 35:125-130 11. Stener B (1971) Total spondylectomy in chondrosarcoma arising from the seventh thoracic vertebra. J Bone Joint Surg Br 53:288-295 12. Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Mazel CH, Monpierre H (1990) Total vertebrectomy as treatment of malignant tumors of the spine. Chir Organi Mov 75:94-96 13. Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Bisserie M, Judet T, Hautefort E, Mamoudy P (1981) [Total excision of thoracic vertebrae (author's transl)]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 67:421-430 14. Tomita K, Toribatake Y, Kawahara N, Ohnari H, Kose H (1994) Total en bloc spondylectomy and circumspinal decompression for solitary spinal metastasis. Paraplegia 32:36-46. doi: 10.1038/sc.1994.7 15. Clarke MJ, Hsu W, Suk I, McCarthy E, Black JH, 3rd, Sciubba DM, Bydon A, Yassari R, Witham TF, Gokaslan ZL, Wolinsky JP (2011) Three-level en bloc spondylectomy for chordoma. Neurosurgery 68:325-333; discussion 333. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31821348c9 16. Santiago-Dieppa DR, Hwang LS, Bydon A, Gokaslan ZL, McCarthy EF, Witham TF (2014) L4 and L5 spondylectomy for en bloc resection of giant cell tumor and review of the literature. Evid Based Spine Care J 5:151-157. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1387804 17. von der Hoeh NH, Tschoeke SK, Gulow J, Voelker A, Siebolts U, Heyde CE (2014) Total spondylectomy for solitary bone plasmacytoma of the lumbar spine in a young woman: a case report and review of literature. Eur Spine J 23:35-39. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2922-2 18. Casadei R, Mavrogenis AF, De Paolis M, Ruggieri P (2013) Two-stage, combined, three-level en bloc spondylectomy for a recurrent post-radiation sarcoma of the lumbar spine. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 23 Suppl 1:S93-100. doi: 10.1007/s00590-012-1160-3 19. Iacoangeli M, Dobran M, Di Rienzo A, di Somma LG, Alvaro L, Moriconi E, Nocchi N, Gladi M, Scerrati M (2012) Nonmetastatic Ewing's Sarcoma of the Lumbar Spine in an Adult Patient. Case Rep Oncol Med 2012:165289. doi: 10.1155/2012/165289 20. Lin B, Chen ZW, Wang N, Guo ZM, Liu H, Zeng M (2012) Total en bloc spondylectomy of L3 vertebra for histiocytic sarcoma. Orthopedics 35:e610-614. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120327-38 21. Druschel C, Disch AC, Melcher I, Engelhardt T, Luzzati A, Haas NP, Schaser KD (2012) Surgical management of recurrent thoracolumbar spinal sarcoma with 4-level total en bloc spondylectomy: description of technique and report of two cases. Eur Spine J 21:1-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1859-6 22. Kawahara N, Tomita K, Murakami H, Demura S, Yoshioka K, Kato S (2011) Total en bloc spondylectomy of the lower lumbar spine: a surgical techniques of combined posterior-anterior approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:74-82. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cded6c 23. Payne WG, Naidu DK, Wheeler CK, Barkoe D, Mentis M, Salas RE, Smith DJ, Jr., Robson MC (2008) Wound healing in patients with cancer. Eplasty 8:e9 24. Kim JE, Pang J, Christensen JM, Coon D, Zadnik PL, Wolinsky JP, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon A, Sciubba DM, Witham T, Redett RJ, Sacks JM (2015) Soft-tissue reconstruction after total en bloc sacrectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 22:571-581. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE14114 25. Hayashi H, Murakami H, Demura S, Kato S, Yoshioka K, Shinmura K, Yokogawa N, Ishii T, Fang X, Shirai T, Tsuchiya H (2015) Surgical site infection after total en bloc spondylectomy: risk factors and the preventive new technology. Spine J 15:132-137. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.08.007 26. Hsieh PC, Li KW, Sciubba DM, Suk I, Wolinsky JP, Gokaslan ZL (2009) Posterior-only approach for total en bloc spondylectomy for malignant primary spinal neoplasms: anatomic considerations and operative nuances. Neurosurgery 65:173-181; discussion 181. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000345630.47344.17 27. Huang L, Chen K, Ye JC, Tang Y, Yang R, Wang P, Shen HY (2013) Modified total en bloc spondylectomy for thoracolumbar spinal tumors via a single posterior approach. Eur Spine J 22:556-564. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2460-3 28. Bragg D, El-Sharkawy AM, Psaltis E, Maxwell-Armstrong CA, Lobo DN (2015) Postoperative ileus: Recent developments in pathophysiology and management. Clin Nutr 34:367-376. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.01.016 29. Elder BD, Holmes C, Lo S-fL, Puvanesarajah V, Goodwin CR, Witham TF Effect of Single versus Hypofractionated Focused Radiation Therapy on Vertebral Structure. The Spine Journal 15:S186-S187. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.240

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy