Skip to main content
  • Reliability of Pedicle Screw EMG Monitoring in Predicting Pedicle Breach When Utilizing Intraoperative CT Guided Neuronavigation in Conjunction With a Navigated High Speed Drill in Instrumented Poste

    Final Number:
    1156

    Authors:
    Melvin Field MD, FAANS; Firas Sbeih MS3; John Stelzer MS3; Bradley Seltmann ANSPA

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2016 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Pedicle screw stabilization is perhaps the most common way surgeons fixate the unstable spine. Accuracy of screw placement is crucial to prevent neurovascular injury, pain, or biomechanical failure. Electromyography (EMG) is commonly used to analyze the accuracy of screw placement, but recent literature has questioned the value of EMG in detecting bony breaches caused by screw placement. CT is an accepted method to evaluate a bony breach from a malpositioned screw. In this study, the authors evaluated the accuracy of EMG monitoring in predicting bony breaches when utilizing intraoperative CT guided neuronavigation in conjunction with a navigated high speed drill for screw placement.

    Methods: 100 consecutive patients who underwent this procedure at Florida Hospital Orlando between 2011 and 2014 were evaluated. Of these, 89 patients had postoperative CT imaging for analysis. The data analyzed includes the total number of screws placed, the total number of screw breaches based on post-op CT, and the EMG results of each screw placed. The number of screw breaches based on post-op CT was compared to EMG results to determine whether a correlation exists.

    Results: A total of 728 screws were inserted for the 89 patients. The accuracy of screw placement was 98.8% with only 9 screws (1.2%) showing a bony breach on CT. Meanwhile out of the 728 screws inserted only 5 screws (0.69%) demonstrated an EMG positive result, yet none showed breach by CT. The 9 screws that showed pedicle breach showed normal EMG values.

    Conclusions: Intraoperative CT guided power drill neuronavigation demonstrates an accuracy of 98.8% and a lack correlation between post-op CT and EMG results. Post-op CT is a more accurate measure for the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, and an alternative for EMG needs to be established as a standard of care for spinal fusion surgery.

    Patient Care: Improved method for pedicle screw placement

    Learning Objectives: 1. Assess the correlation between EMG and post-operative CT in detecting pedicle screw perforation. 2. Suggest alternatives for assessing screw accuracy in surgical management. 3. Introduce a novel approach for pedicle screw placement in spinal fusion surgery.

    References: 1. Hartl R, Theodore N, Dickman CA, Sonntag VKH. Technique of thoracic pedicle screw fixation for trauma. Operative Techniques in Neurosurgery. 2004;7(1):22-30. 2. Manbachi A, Cobbold RS, Ginsberg HJ. Guided pedicle screw insertion: techniques and training. The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society. 2014;14(1):165-179. 3. Laine T, Lund T, Ylikoski M, Lohikoski J, Schlenzka D. Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur. Spine J. 2000;9(3):235-240. 4. Han W, Gao ZL, Wang JC, et al. Pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: a comparison study of computer-assisted navigation and conventional techniques. Orthopedics. 2010;33(8). 5. Shin BJ, James AR, Njoku IU, Hartl R. Pedicle screw navigation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perforation risk for computer-navigated versus freehand insertion. J. Neurosurg. Spine. 2012;17(2):113-122. 6. Villard J, Ryang YM, Demetriades AK, et al. Radiation exposure to the surgeon and the patient during posterior lumbar spinal instrumentation: a prospective randomized comparison of navigated versus non-navigated freehand techniques. Spine. 2014;39(13):1004-1009. 7. Uhl E, Zausinger S, Morhard D, et al. Intraoperative computed tomography with integrated navigation system in a multidisciplinary operating suite. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(5 Suppl 2):231-239; discussion 239-240. 8. Nolte LP, Zamorano L, Visarius H, et al. Clinical evaluation of a system for precision enhancement in spine surgery. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon). 1995;10(6):293-303. 9. Liu YJ, Tian W, Liu B, et al. [Accuracy of CT-based navigation of pedicle screws implantation in the cervical spine compared with X-ray fluoroscopy technique]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2005;43(20):1328-1330. 10. Seller K, Wild A, Urselmann L, Krauspe R. [Prospective screw misplacement analysis after conventional and navigated pedicle screw implantation]. Biomed. Tech. (Berl.). 2005;50(9):287-292.

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy